Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23403539›Full record

ArticleJAMA pediatrics2013

Correlation of neonatal intensive care unit performance across multiple measures of quality of care.

Jochen Profit, John A F Zupancic, Jeffrey B Gould, Kenneth Pietz, Marc A Kowalkowski, David Draper, Sylvia J Hysong, Laura A Petersen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02603133 (Web-based Implementation for the Science of Enhancing Resilience Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02603133 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Web-based Implementation for the Science of Enhancing Resilience Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled2,650ConditionsBurnout, Professional, Resilience, PsychologicalArmsThree Good Things, Gratitude, Random Acts of Kindess, Awe, 1 Good Chat
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Level III neonatal intensive care unit heterogeneity in patients, services, and outcomes.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Racial and ethnic disparities in postnatal growth among very low birth weight infants in California.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Multilevel social factors and NICU quality of care in California.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Never judge a book by its cover: how NICU evaluators reach conclusions about quality of care.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  18. Disparities in NICU quality of care: a qualitative study of family and clinician accounts.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jochen ProfitDepartment of Pediatrics. profit@bcm.edu
John A F Zupancic
Jeffrey B Gould
Kenneth Pietz
Marc A Kowalkowski
David Draper
Sylvia J Hysong
Laura A Petersen

Funding

Development and Validation of a Scorecard of Neonatal Intensive Care QualityK23HD056298 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PROFIT, JOCHEN · 2007 to 2011
$682k
NICHD NIH HHS 1 K23 HD056298NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD056298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine whether high performance on one measure of quality is associated with high performance on others and to develop a data-driven explanatory model of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) performance.

designWe conducted a cross-sectional data analysis of a statewide perinatal care database. Risk-adjusted NICU ranks were computed for each of 8 measures of quality selected based on expert input. Correlations across measures were tested using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine whether underlying factors were driving the correlations.

settingTwenty-two regional NICUs in California. PATIENTS: In total, 5445 very low-birth-weight infants cared for between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2007. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Pneumothorax, growth velocity, health care-associated infection, antenatal corticosteroid use, hypothermia during the first hour of life, chronic lung disease, mortality in the NICU, and discharge on any human breast milk.

resultsThe NICUs varied substantially in their clinical performance across measures of quality. Of 28 unit-level correlations, 6 were significant (ρ < .05). Correlations between pairs of measures of quality of care were strong (ρ ≥ .5) for 1 pair, moderate (range, ρ ≥ .3 to ρ < .5) for 8 pairs, weak (range, ρ ≥ .1 to ρ < .3) for 5 pairs, and negligible (ρ < .1) for 14 pairs. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 4 underlying factors of quality in this sample. Pneumothorax, mortality in the NICU, and antenatal corticosteroid use loaded on factor 1; growth velocity and health care-associated infection loaded on factor 2; chronic lung disease loaded on factor 3; and discharge on any human breast milk loaded on factor 4.

conclusionIn this sample, the ability of individual measures of quality to explain overall quality of neonatal intensive care was modest.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingCaliforniaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesInfant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLogistic ModelsMaleModels, StatisticalOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality Indicators, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID23403539
PMCPMC4028032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.