Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23403507›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2013

Effect of a single session of muscle-biased therapy on pain sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Charles W Gay, Meryl J Alappattu, Rogelio A Coronado, Maggie E Horn, Mark D Bishop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Expectations affect pain sensitivity changes during massage.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles W GayRehabilitation Science Doctoral Program, College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, FL.
Meryl J Alappattu
Rogelio A Coronado
Maggie E Horn
Mark D Bishop
University of Florida · US

Funding

Training In Rehabilitation and Neuromuscular PlasticityT32HD043730 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DAVID D FULLER · 2003 to 2026
$5.3M
Central Mechanisms of Body Based Intervention for Musculoskeletal Low Back PainR01AT006334 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BISHOP, MARK D. · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
CENTRAL MECHANISMS OF MANIPULATIVE AND BODY-BASED INTERVENTIONS: TRAINING PROGRAMF32AT007729 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PENZA, CHARLES W · 2013 to 2015
$200k
NCCIH NIH HHS F32 AT007729NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT006334NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD043730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle-biased therapies (MBT) are commonly used to treat pain, yet several reviews suggest evidence for the clinical effectiveness of these therapies is lacking. Inadequate treatment parameters have been suggested to account for inconsistent effects across studies. Pain sensitivity may serve as an intermediate physiologic endpoint helping to establish optimal MBT treatment parameters. The purpose of this review was to summarize the current literature investigating the short-term effect of a single dose of MBT on pain sensitivity in both healthy and clinical populations, with particular attention to specific MBT parameters of intensity and duration.

methodsA systematic search for articles meeting our prespecified criteria was conducted using Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and MEDLINE from the inception of each database until July 2012, in accordance with guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis. Relevant characteristics from studies included type, intensity, and duration of MBT and whether short-term changes in pain sensitivity and clinical pain were noted with MBT application. Study results were pooled using a random-effects model to estimate the overall effect size of a single dose of MBT on pain sensitivity as well as the effect of MBT, dependent on comparison group and population type.

resultsReports from 24 randomized controlled trials (23 articles) were included, representing 36 MBT treatment arms and 29 comparative groups, where 10 groups received active agents, 11 received sham/inert treatments, and eight received no treatment. MBT demonstrated a favorable and consistent ability to modulate pain sensitivity. Short-term modulation of pain sensitivity was associated with short-term beneficial effects on clinical pain. Intensity of MBT, but not duration, was linked with change in pain sensitivity. A meta-analysis was conducted on 17 studies that assessed the effect of MBT on pressure pain thresholds. The results suggest that MBT had a favorable effect on pressure pain thresholds when compared with no-treatment and sham/inert groups, and effects comparable with those of other active treatments.

conclusionThe evidence supports the use of pain sensitivity measures by future research to help elucidate optimal therapeutic parameters for MBT as an intermediate physiologic marker.

Indexed as

muscle-biased therapypain sensitivitypressure pain threshold

Identifiers

PMID23403507
PMCPMC3569047
OpenAlexW2092539033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.