Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23402963›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine2013

Evolution of cervical cancer screening and prevention in United States and Canada: implications for public health practitioners and clinicians.

M Saraiya, M Steben, M Watson, L Markowitz

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cervical Cancer Elimination Is Dependent on Women's Self-Tests for Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing Triaged by Methylation Status.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Assessing Impact of HPV Vaccination on Cervical Cancer Incidence among Women Aged 15-29 Years in the United States, 1999-2017: An Ecologic Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M SaraiyaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: yzs2@cdc.gov.
M Steben
M Watson
L Markowitz
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CANational Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDeclines in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Canada and in the United States have been widely attributed to the introduction of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. This article reviews changes in screening and introduction of HPV vaccination.

methodSentinel events in cervical cancer screening and primary prevention through HPV vaccination in the US and Canada are described.

resultsDespite commonalities, cervical cancer screening and prevention differ between the two countries. Canada has a combination of opportunistic and organized programs at the provincial and territorial level, while the US has opportunistic screening and vaccination systems. In the US, the HPV test along with the Pap test (co-testing) is part of national recommendations for routine cervical cancer screening for women age 30 and older. Co-testing is not being considered anywhere in Canada, but primary HPV testing is currently recommended (but not implemented) in one province in Canada.

conclusionMany prevention strategies are available for cervical cancer. Continued public health efforts should focus on increasing vaccine coverage in the target age groups and cervical cancer screening for women at appropriate intervals. Ongoing evaluation will be needed to ensure appropriate use of health resources, as vaccinated women become eligible for screening.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonPublic Health PracticeAdultCanadaEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidencePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesSurvival RateUnited StatesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsUtilization ReviewVaginal SmearsPapillomavirus VaccinesHPVNorth AmericaScreeningUS and CanadaVaccination

Identifiers

PMID23402963
PMCPMC4515308
OpenAlexW1965884995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.