ArticleUltrasonics2013
Nonlinear characterization of breast cancer using multi-compression 3D ultrasound elastography in vivo.
Article in Ultrasonics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D multiparametric ultrasound imaging of steatotic liver disease in a study with male rats.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Force-Matched Approach to Large-Strain Nonlinearity in Elasticity Imaging for Breast Lesion Characterization.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024Article
- A review of bioengineering techniques applied to breast tissue: Mechanical properties, tissue engineering and finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Nonlinear Elasticity Assessment with Optical Coherence Elastography for High-Selectivity Differentiation of Breast Cancer Tissues.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- 3-D H-Scan Ultrasound Imaging and Use of a Convolutional Neural Network for Scatterer Size Estimation.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2020Article
- Observational
- Difference-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging With Non-Linear Contrast.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020Article
- Large-Strain 3-D in Vivo Breast Ultrasound Strain Elastography Using a Multi-compression Strategy and a Whole-Breast Scanning System.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2019Article
- Data-Driven Elasticity Imaging Using Cartesian Neural Network Constitutive Models and the Autoprogressive Method.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2019Article
- Application of Acoustoelasticity to Evaluate Nonlinear Modulus in Ex Vivo Kidneys.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2018Article
- Five-dimensional ultrasound system for soft tissue visualization.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2015Article
- An analysis of the segmentation threshold used in axial-shear strain elastography.Ultrasonics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The main objective of this article is to introduce a new nonlinear elastography based classification method for human breast masses. Multi-compression elastography imaging is elucidated in this study to differentiate malignant from benign lesions, based on their nonlinear mechanical behavior under compression. Three classification parameters were used and compared in this work: a new nonlinear parameter based on a power-law behavior of the strain difference between breast masses and healthy tissues, mass-soft tissue strain ratio and the mass relative volume between B-mode and elastography imaging. Using 3D elastography, these parameters were tested in vivo. A pilot study on 10 patients was performed, and results were compared with biopsy diagnosis as a gold standard. Initial elastography results showed a good agreement with biopsy outcomes. The new estimated nonlinear parameter had an average value of 0.163±0.063 and 1.642±0.261 for benign and malignant masses, respectively. Strain ratio values for the benign and malignant masses had an average value of 2.135±0.707 and 4.21±2.108, respectively. Relative mass volume was 0.848±0.237 and 2.18±0.522 for benign and malignant masses. In addition to the traditional normal axial strain, new strain types were used for elastography and constructed in 3D, including the first principal, maximum shear and Von Mises strains. The new strains provided an enhanced distinction of the stiff lesion from the soft tissue. In summary, the proposed elastographic techniques can be used as a noninvasive quantitative characterization tool for breast cancer, with the capability of visualizing and separating the masses in a three dimensional space. This may reduce the number of unnecessary painful breast biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.