Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23402714›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2013

Eating-related behaviors and appetite during energy imbalance in obese-prone and obese-resistant individuals.

Elizabeth A Thomas, Jaime L Bechtell, Brian E Vestal, Susan L Johnson, Daniel H Bessesen, Jason R Tregellas, Marc-Andre Cornier

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of Exercise during Weight Loss Maintenance on Appetite Regulation in Women.Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth A ThomasDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Elizabeth.Thomas@ucdenver.edu
Jaime L Bechtell
Brian E Vestal
Susan L Johnson
Daniel H Bessesen
Jason R Tregellas
Marc-Andre Cornier

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025780 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2008 to 2011
$61.3M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
PILOT STUDY--SUBSTRATE METABOLISM IN EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSP30DK048520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Edward L Melanson · 1995 to 2026
$32.6M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1)UL1TR000154 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2012 to 2013
$20.4M
Neuronal Responses to Effective Weight Loss Maintenance StrategiesR01DK089095 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CORNIER, MARC-ANDRE, TREGELLAS, JASON R · 2010 to 2013
$1.7M
The Effects of Enerty Imbalance on Food Intake BehaviorsR01DK072174 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CORNIER, MARC-ANDRE · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
The Effects of Overfeeding on OP and OR WomenR01DK062874 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BESSESEN, DANIEL HOLLAND · 2003 to 2007
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000154NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025780NIDDK NIH HHS DK48520NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK048520NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062874NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072174NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK072174NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK089095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the majority of Americans are now overweight, some individuals maintain their weight with minimal effort. This study investigated behavioral differences between 58 individuals recruited as either obese-resistant (OR) or obese-prone (OP) based on self-identification, BMI, and personal/family weight history. Subjects were studied during Eucaloric (EU), Overfed (OF), and Underfed (UF) phases which included a run-in diet, 1 day intervention diet, and a study day. At baseline, subjects completed the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) and Power of Food Scale (PFS). On the study day, ratings of appetite, food appeal and desire, and food cravings were performed in response to a breakfast shake. OF resulted in reduced hunger and food desire while UF resulted in increased hunger and food appeal and desire. While hunger did not differ between groups, OP had higher scores for TFEQ measures (hunger, restraint and disinhibition), higher "hedonic hunger" as measured by the PFS, and greater food cravings and ratings of food appeal and desire. These results suggest that subjective hunger and desire for food change significantly after only one day of over- or underfeeding. Additionally, we found several behavioral differences between groups that are likely to promote weight gain over time in the OP.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeEnergy MetabolismFeeding BehaviorHungerInhibition, PsychologicalAdultAppetiteBody Mass IndexBreakfastFemaleHumansHyperphagiaMaleObesityPleasureSocial Control, Informal

Identifiers

PMID23402714
PMCPMC3622833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.