Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23400851›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2013

Closer look at the operating definition of protein recovery in CE.

Jose H Espinal, Jorge E Gómez, Junior E Sandoval

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jose H EspinalDepartment of Chemistry, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Jorge E Gómez
Junior E Sandoval

Funding

Hydrolytically stable hydrophilic CE coatings for protein characterizationR01GM089759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VALLE · PI SANDOVAL, JUNIOR EMIRO · 2010 to 2012
$191k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089759NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM089759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyte recovery is an important figure to assess protein adsorption on fused-silica capillaries. In 1991, Regnier et al. estimated recovery by assuming the loss of analyte from adsorption and thus the decrease in peak area measured by two detectors to be proportional to the length of the capillary section between them. In this report, we closely examine this concept and its adaptation to commercial CE instruments to determine protein recovery. We hypothesize that, once a steady-state migration is reached, protein adsorption is a first-order process with respect to protein concentration and surface density of adsorbing sites. This hypothesis is shown to be valid over a reasonably wide range of capillary effective length and, as a result, protein recovery decreases exponentially with the migrated distance. However, unlike the traditional recovery figure obtained through a conventional spike process, protein recovery measured by this approach does not have the same merit since it is strongly dependent from capillary dimensions and applied electric field. Nevertheless, protein recovery and the slope of the logarithmic protein peak area versus length plot are useful figures to compare protein adsorption on different capillary surfaces. Several literature reports dealing with the application of Regnier concept to calculate protein recovery are discussed.

Indexed as

AdsorptionElectrophoresis, CapillaryLinear ModelsModels, TheoreticalProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSilicon DioxideProteinsSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID23400851
PMCPMC3753406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.