Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23400846›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2013

How reliable are county and regional health rankings?

Stephan Arndt, Laura Acion, Kristin Caspers, Phyllis Blood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Ranking of immunization programs in Latin America, 2019Ranking dos programas de imunização na América Latina, 2019].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Value-based focused global population health management.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Just How Useful Are Health Rankings?Health services research · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Modeling Area-Level Health Rankings.Health services research · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephan ArndtDepartment of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. stephan-arndt@uiowa.edu
Laura Acion
Kristin Caspers
Phyllis Blood

Funding

GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN ETIOLOGY OF DRUG ABUSER01DA005821 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ARNDT, STEPHAN · 1989 to 2008
$5.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA005821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveillance system indicators of morbidity, mortality, or behaviors are used to provide regional information for ever-smaller areas, most recently for ranking counties. These rankings are thought to provide information about the relative standing of regions and provide information about problem areas and the success of programs. We investigate the ability of such rankings to reliably assess health. We assess the reliability of several ranked health indices used at the county level and the consistency of an index's quality across different states. Reliability is assessed using an index of reliability, simulations, and the ability of an index to consistently identify the top 10 % (worst) counties within a state. There is marked variability across measures to provide consistent ranks, across states, and, many times, across states for a particular measure. A few health measures do consistently well, e.g., Teen Birth, Chlamydia, and Years of Potential Life Lost rates. While a few health rankings appear worthy of use for policy and in the identification of local problems, in general, they are not consistent across regions.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsHealth PolicyHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID23400846
PMCPMC8335645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.