Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23400789›Full record

ReviewElectrophoresis2013

Protein dielectrophoresis: advances, challenges, and applications.

Asuka Nakano, Alexandra Ros

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Electrophoresis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Asuka NakanoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Alexandra Ros

Funding

A Microfluidic Protein Separation Device Based on DielectrophoresisR21RR025826 · NCRR · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI ROS, ALEXANDRA · 2010 to 2011
$361k
A Microfluidic Protein Separation Device Based on DielectrophoresisR21GM103522 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI ROS, ALEXANDRA · 2012 to 2012
$180k
NCRR NIH HHS 5R21RR025826-03NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR025826NIGMS NIH HHS 8R21GM103522-03NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM103522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein dielectrophoresis (DEP) has the potential to play an important role as a manipulation, fractionation, preconcentration, and separation method in bioanalysis and as manipulation tool for nanotechnological applications. The first demonstrations of protein DEP have been reported almost 20 years ago. Since then various experimental realizations to manipulate proteins by DEP as well as more targeted applications employing protein DEP have been demonstrated. This review summarizes the experimental studies in the field of protein DEP trapping and focusing as well as specific applications in separation, molecular patterning, on bioprobes and biosensors. While a comprehensive theoretical model describing protein DEP is still lacking we also attempt to provide an overview of the factors influencing protein DEP and relate to currently available theoretical models. We further point out the variations in experimental conditions used in the past to study the somewhat 20 proteins as well as the implications of protein molecular structure to the DEP response.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesElectrophoresisMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID23400789
PMCPMC3839426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.