Medication reconciliation practices and potential clinical impact of unintentional discrepancies.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. [Iatrogenic disease in the elderly: about two cases of tricyclics-induced renal failure].The Pan African medical journal · 2018
   Article
2. Medication Reconciliation Failures in Children and Young Adults With Chronic Disease During Intensive and Intermediate Care.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2017
   Observational
3. A Pharmacist-Led Quality Improvement Project to Optimize Medication Evaluation and Reconciliation in Home Healthcare.Home healthcare now
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Hospital-based medication reconciliation practices: a systematic review.2012

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as