Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23400614›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2013

Cost-effectiveness of the School-Based Asthma Therapy (SBAT) program.

Katia Noyes, Alina Bajorska, Susan Fisher, Joseph Sauer, Maria Fagnano, Jill S Halterman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01175369 (School-Based Asthma Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01175369 nacompletednot on this map

School-Based Asthma Therapy: Stage 2 Effectiveness Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RochesterRan2006 to 2012Enrolled530ConditionsAsthmaArmsSchool-based Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Asthma education for school staff.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katia NoyesDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. katia_noyes@urmc.rochester.edu
Alina Bajorska
Susan Fisher
Joseph Sauer
Maria Fagnano
Jill S Halterman

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER'S RESEARCH ASSOCIATE ORGANIZATIONUL1RR024160 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PEARSON, THOMAS ARTHUR · 2006 to 2011
$38.7M
School-Based Telemedicine Enhanced Asthma Management (SB-TEAM)R01HL079954 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HALTERMAN, JILL S · 2006 to 2016
$6.6M
NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL1 RR024160-01NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024160NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL079954NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL079954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveImpoverished urban children suffer disproportionately from asthma and underuse preventive asthma medications. The objective of this study was to examine cost-effectiveness (CE) of the School-Based Asthma Therapy (SBAT) program compared with usual care (UC).

methodsThe analysis was based on the SBAT trial, including 525 children aged 3 to 10 years attending urban preschool or elementary school who were randomized to either UC or administration of 1 dose of preventive asthma medication at school by the school nurse each school day. The primary outcome was the mean number of symptom-free days (SFDs). The impact of the intervention on medical costs was estimated by using parent-reported child health services utilization data and average national reimbursement rates. We estimated the cost of running the program using wages for program staff. Productivity costs were estimated by using value of parent lost time due to child illness. CE of the SBAT program compared with UC was evaluated based on the incremental CE ratio.

resultsThe health benefit of the intervention was equal to ∼158 SFD gained per each 30-day period (P < .05) per 100 children. The programmatic expenses summed to an extra $4822 per 100 children per month. The net saving due to the intervention (reduction in medical costs and parental productivity, and improvement in school attendance) was $3240, resulting in the incremental cost-savings difference of $1583 and CE of $10 per 1 extra SFD gained.

conclusionsThe SBAT was effective and cost-effective in reducing symptoms in urban children with asthma compared with other existing programs.

Indexed as

Urban PopulationAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleSchools

Identifiers

PMID23400614
PMCPMC3581846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.