ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2015
[Sepsis - Knowledge of non-physician personnel in Africa. A cross-sectional study in Malawian district hospitals].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare professionals' level of medication knowledge in Africa: a systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Challenges and Solutions in translating sepsis guidelines into practice in resource-limited settings.Translational pediatrics · 2021Review
- The global burden of sepsis: barriers and potential solutions.Critical care (London, England) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalawi has one of the worst human resource situations in the world and each clinically working doctor has to serve around 50,000 patients. There are almost no Malawian specialists physicians so that in the district hospitals it is usually non-medical staff (e.g. anesthesia clinical officer) who have the responsibility for severely sick patients with sepsis. At the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital we have organized different courses over the years to support these colleagues.
methodsAnonymous questionnaires with 10 multiple choice and 4 feedback-related questions were distributed to 115 participants in order to achieve an overview of the basic knowledge related to sepsis in the Malawian setting.
resultsIn total 64.2 % of the questions were answered correctly with only minor differences between the 4 groups of participants from different professional backgrounds. Despite a relatively good knowledge in practical therapy the question concerning the therapeutic strategies of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign obtained the worst score with 6 %. After the course there was a 17 % increase in correctly answered questions. Besides an overview over the diagnostic and therapeutic situation for sepsis in the districts we received suggestions and critical comments for a better adjustment of our courses towards the reality of rural district hospitals.
conclusionsHealthcare workers in Malawi are not aware of key recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Guidelines have to be adapted to the specific healthcare structures in underdeveloped countries. We realized the wish and the desire of the participants for more training and more courses in Malawi. In order to be able to support these needs we would like to invite cooperation from interested institutions and colleagues for a special sepsis course on the occasion of the annual World Sepsis Days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.