Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23400389›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2013

Evolution of an ancient microsatellite hotspot in the conifer mitochondrial genome and comparison with other plants.

Juan P Jaramillo-Correa, Erika Aguirre-Planter, Luis E Eguiarte, Damase P Khasa, Jean Bousquet

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multicentric origin and diversification ofEvolutionary applications · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan P Jaramillo-CorreaDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico, DF, Mexico. jaramillo@ecologia.unam.mx
Erika Aguirre-Planter
Luis E Eguiarte
Damase P Khasa
Jean Bousquet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plants, mitochondrial sequence tandem repeats (STRs) have been associated with intragenomic recombination, a process held responsible for evolutionary outcomes such as gene regulation or cytoplasmic male-sterility. However, no link has been established between the recurrent accumulation of STRs and increased mutation rates in specific regions of the plant mtDNA genome. Herein, we surveyed this possibility by comparing, in a phylogenetic context, the variation of a STR-rich mitochondrial intron (nad5-4) with eleven mtDNA genes devoid of STRs within Abies (Pinaceae) and its related genera. This intron has been accumulating repeated stretches, generated by at least three-independent insertions, before the split of the two Pinaceae subfamilies, Abietoideae and Pinoideae. The last of these insertions occurred before the divergence of Abies and produced, exclusively within this genus, a tenfold increase of both the indel and substitution rates in the STR hotspot of the intron. The regions flanking the STRs harbored mutation rates as low as those estimated in mitochondrial genes devoid of repeated stretches. Further searches in complete plant mtDNA genomes, and previous studies reporting polymorphic mtSTRs, revealed that repeated stretches are common in all sorts of plants, but their accumulation in STR hotspots appears to be taxa specific. Our study suggests a new mutagenic role for repeated sequences in the plant mtDNA.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, PlantAbiesBase SequenceGenes, MitochondrialGenome, MitochondrialMicrosatellite RepeatsMutagenesis, InsertionalMutationPhylogenyPinaceae

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.