ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2013
Developing a scoring guide for the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument in Korea: a modified Delphi consensus process.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Characterization and critical appraisal of physiotherapy intervention research in Nigeria: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Korean clinical practice guideline for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Investigative and clinical urology · 2016Guideline
- Development of Quality Management Systems for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015Guideline
- Developing an index for measuring gender lens investing in organizations: the GLIMETRICS framework.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- History of the Task Force for the Korean Clinical Guidelines of the Developmental Disorders.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2024Article
- Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines: Current Status of Adherence to the RIGHT Checklist.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- Revised Korean Society of Infectious Diseases/National Evidence-based Healthcarea Collaborating Agency Guidelines on the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19.Infection & chemotherapy · 2021Review
- Delphi Survey for Designing a Intervention Research Study on Childhood Obesity Prevention.Korean journal of family medicine · 2017Article
- Methodological Quality Appraisal of 27 Korean Guidelines Using a Scoring Guide Based on the AGREE II Instrument and a Web-based Evaluation.Journal of Korean medical science · 2016Article
- National Priority Setting of Clinical Practice Guidelines Development for Chronic Disease Management.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015Article
- Applying the RE-AIM Framework to Evaluate the Dissemination and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sexually Transmitted Infections.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015Article
- Improving the reliability of clinical practice guideline appraisals: effects of the Korean AGREE II scoring guide.Journal of Korean medical science · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Korea has a relatively short history in the development and use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Additionally, it has been difficult to employ the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument due to the lack of consensus and the presence of differences in Korean medical settings and in the Korean socio-cultural environment. An AGREE II scoring guide was therefore developed to reduce differences among evaluators using the same tool. In consideration of the importance of using a quantitative measure of satisfaction with the elements described in the AGREE II manual, a final draft was developed through a Delphi consensus process. Ninety-two draft scoring guides for anchor points 1, 3, 5, and 7 (full score) in 23 items were developed. Consensus was defined as agreement among at least 70% of the raters. Agreement on 88 draft scoring guidelines was reached in the first Delphi round, and agreement for the remaining four was achieved in the second round. The development of an AGREE II scoring guide in this study is expected to contribute to improving the CPG environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.