Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23400100›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2013

Organization and segregation of bacterial chromosomes.

Xindan Wang, Paula Montero Llopis, David Z Rudner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dps binds and protects DNA in starvedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. The role of active mRNA-ribosome dynamics and closing constriction in daughter chromosome separation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Inhibitor of Chromosome Segregation inACS chemical biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xindan WangHarvard Medical School, Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, HIM 1025, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Paula Montero Llopis
David Z Rudner

Funding

Chromosome Dynamics in Bacillus SubtillsR01GM086466 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI RUDNER, DAVID Z · 2009 to 2021
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM086466NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial chromosome must be compacted more than 1,000-fold to fit into the compartment in which it resides. How it is condensed, organized and ultimately segregated has been a puzzle for over half a century. Recent advances in live-cell imaging and genome-scale analyses have led to new insights into these problems. We argue that the key feature of compaction is the orderly folding of DNA along adjacent segments and that this organization provides easy and efficient access for protein-DNA transactions and has a central role in driving segregation. Similar principles and common proteins are used in eukaryotes to condense and to resolve sister chromatids at metaphase.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationBacterial ProteinsChromatidsChromosomes, BacterialChromosome SegregationDNA, BacterialDNA ReplicationMetaphaseProtein ConformationBacterial ProteinsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23400100
PMCPMC3869393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.