Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23399890›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2013

The temporal pattern of stimulation may be important to the mechanism of deep brain stimulation.

Christopher W Hess, David E Vaillancourt, Michael S Okun

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07213999 (Evaluating and Understanding the Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation Using Novel Electrophysiology Technique and Device in Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07213999 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating and Understanding the Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation Using Novel Electrophysiology Technique and Device in Parkinson's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2022 to 2022Enrolled1ConditionsParkinson's Disease (PD)ArmsNovel neural recorder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Computer-Guided Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Parkinson's Disease.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2016
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in closed-loop deep brain stimulation devices.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Computational modeling to improve treatments for essential tremor.Drug discovery today. Disease models · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher W HessCenter for Parkinson's Disease and Other Movement Disorders, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
David E Vaillancourt
Michael S Okun
University of Florida · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Role of the Cortex and Cerebellum in Visually-Guided Motor BehaviorR01NS058487 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI JAFFEE, MICHAEL S., VAILLANCOURT, DAVID E · 2008 to 2025
$6.1M
Scaling and Sequencing Motor Output in Humans: fMRI StudyR01NS052318 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI VAILLANCOURT, DAVID E · 2005 to 2020
$6.0M
Non-Invasive Markers of Neurodegeneration in Movement DisordersR01NS075012 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LI, YUQING, VAILLANCOURT, DAVID E · 2012 to 2022
$4.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052318NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS058487NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as an important and potentially powerful treatment option for the management of carefully selected patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) who are not adequately controlled by standard medication therapy. Though considerable advances have been made, the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of DBS remain unclear despite its clinical efficacy. It is now widely held that both excitation and inhibition can occur secondary to stimulation, and it is suspected that abnormal synchronized oscillations may also be important in the mechanism of DBS. Other potentially important processes, including blood flow changes, local and upstream neurogenesis, and the modulation of neurotransmitters through stimulation of bordering astrocytes are also being investigated. Recent research has suggested that the temporal pattern of DBS stimulation is also an important variable in DBS neuromodulation, yet the extent of its influence on DBS efficacy has yet to be determined. As high stimulation frequency alone does not appear to be sufficient for optimal symptom suppression, attention to stimulation pattern might lead to more effective symptom control and reduced side effects, possibly at a lower frequency. Stimulation pattern may be potentially amenable to therapeutic modulation and its role in the clinical efficacy of DBS should be addressed through further focus and research.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsDeep Brain StimulationAnimalsHumansMovement DisordersDeep brain stimulationFrequencyNon-regularTemporal pattern

Identifiers

PMID23399890
PMCPMC3742615
OpenAlexW1971916179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.