ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2013
Global comparisons of lectin-glycan interactions using a database of analyzed glycan array data.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotypic and safety exploration of indigenous bacterial strains for probiotic applications in aquaculture.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Tools for investigating host-microbe crosstalk using glycan analysis probes inspired by human lectins.Glycobiology · 2025Article
- The energetic landscape of CH-π interactions in protein-carbohydrate binding.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Glycan analysis probes inspired by human lectins for investigating host-microbe crosstalk.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Boltzmann Model Predicts Glycan Structures from Lectin Binding.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- A Boltzmann model predicts glycan structures from lectin binding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Development and applications of sialoglycan-recognizing probes (SGRPs) with defined specificities: exploring the dynamic mammalian sialoglycome.Glycobiology · 2022Article
- A Useful Guide to Lectin Binding: Machine-Learning Directed Annotation of 57 Unique Lectin Specificities.ACS chemical biology · 2022Article
- LectinOracle: A Generalizable Deep Learning Model for Lectin-Glycan Binding Prediction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Effects of Dietary Doum Palm Fruit Powder on Growth, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Response, and Disease Resistance of African Catfish,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Microarray analyses of closely related glycoforms reveal different accessibilities of glycan determinants on N-glycan branches.Glycobiology · 2020Article
- Identifying glycan motifs using a novel subtree mining approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Advances in Tools to Determine the Glycan-Binding Specificities of Lectins and Antibodies.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020Review
- Current Concepts on 6-sulfo LacNAc Expressing Monocytes (slanMo).Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Distinct substrate specificities of human GlcNAc-6-sulfotransferases revealed by mass spectrometry-based sulfoglycomic analysis.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2018Article
- Predicting the Structures of Glycans, Glycoproteins, and Their Complexes.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
- Mining High-Complexity Motifs in Glycans: A New Language To Uncover the Fine Specificities of Lectins and Glycosidases.Analytical chemistry · 2017Article
- Lectins identify distinct populations of coelomocytes in Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.PloS one · 2017Article
- Characterizing Protein Glycosylation through On-Chip Glycan Modification and Probing.Analytical chemistry · 2016Article
- Multi-level regulation of cellular glycosylation: from genes to transcript to enzyme to structure.Current opinion in structural biology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Lectin-glycan interactions have critical functions in multiple normal and pathological processes, but the binding partners and functions for many glycans and lectins are not known. An important step in better understanding glycan-lectin biology is enabling systematic quantification and analysis of the interactions. Glycan arrays can provide the experimental information for such analyses, and the thousands of glycan array datasets available through the Consortium for Functional Glycomics provide the opportunity to extend the analyses to a broad scale. We developed software, based on our previously described Motif Segregation algorithm, for the automated analysis of glycan array data, and we analyzed the entire storehouse of 2883 datasets from the Consortium for Functional Glycomics. We mined the resulting database to make comparisons of specificities across multiple lectins and comparisons between glycans in their lectin receptors. Of the lectins in the database, viral lectins were the most different from other organism types, with specificities nearly always restricted to sialic acids, and mammalian lectins had the most diverse range of specificities. Certain mammalian lectins were unique in their specificities for sulfated glycans. Simple modifications to a lactosamine core structure radically altered the types of lectins that were highly specific for the glycan. Unmodified lactosamine was specifically recognized by plant, fungal, viral, and mammalian lectins; sialylation shifted the binding mainly to viral lectins; and sulfation resulted in mainly mammalian lectins with the highest specificities. We anticipate that this analysis program and database will be valuable in fundamental glycobiology studies, detailed analyses of lectin specificities, and practical applications in translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.