Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23398972›Full record

ArticleProgress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy2013

Radiation damping in modern NMR experiments: progress and challenges.

V V Krishnan, Nagarajan Murali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. OptimalNature protocols · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Solid-stateMagnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  13. Spin noise gradient echoes.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Laser- and cryogenic probe-assisted NMR enables hypersensitive analysis of biomolecules at submicromolar concentration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of radiation damping for biomolecular NMR experiments in solution: a hemisphere concept for water suppression.Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part A, Bridging education and research · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

V V KrishnanDepartment of Chemistry, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740, USA. krish@csufresno.edu
Nagarajan Murali

Funding

Proteomic Signatures of CancerP20MD002732 · NIMHD · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO · PI MORTIMER, AMANDA · 2007 to 2011
$4.3M
Priority ProjectP20CA138025 · NCI · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO · PI BUSH, JASON ALLAN, VUORI, KRISTIINA · 2010 to 2012
$752k
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA 138025NCI NIH HHS P20 CA138025NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD 002732NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD002732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID23398972
PMCPMC3644564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.