Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23398684›Full record

ReviewACS chemical neuroscience2013

Regulation of G protein-coupled receptors by allosteric ligands.

J Robert Lane, Alaa Abdul-Ridha, Meritxell Canals

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Allosteric modulation of gonadotropin receptors.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  6. 2-(Fluoromethoxy)-4'-(Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Allosteric modulation of dopamine DPharmacological reports : PR · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Stereospecific modulation of dimeric rhodopsin.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Development and Testing of Druglike Screening Libraries.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J Robert LaneDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Alaa Abdul-Ridha
Meritxell Canals

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topographically distinct, druggable, allosteric sites may be present on all G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). As such, targeting these sites with synthetic small molecules offers an attractive approach to develop receptor-subtype selective chemical leads for the development of novel therapies. A crucial part of drug development is to understand the acute and chronic effects of such allosteric modulators at their corresponding GPCR target. Key regulatory processes including cell-surface delivery, endocytosis, recycling, and down-regulation tightly control the number of receptors at the surface of the cell. As many GPCR therapeutics will be administered chronically, understanding how such ligands modulate these regulatory pathways forms an essential part of the characterization of novel GPCR ligands. This is true for both orthosteric and allosteric ligands. In this Review, we summarize our current understanding of GPCR regulatory processes with a particular focus on the effects and implications of allosteric targeting of GPCRs.

Indexed as

LigandsAllosteric RegulationAnimalsDrug DiscoveryEndocytosisHumansReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID23398684
PMCPMC3629737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.