Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23398269›Full record

Trial reportBehavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.)2013

Improving confidence for self care in patients with depression and chronic illnesses.

Evette J Ludman, Do Peterson, Wayne J Katon, Elizabeth H B Lin, Michael Von Korff, Paul Ciechanowski, Bessie Young, Jochen Gensichen

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Evette J LudmanGroup Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. ludman.e@ghc.org
Do Peterson
Wayne J Katon
Elizabeth H B Lin
Michael Von Korff
Paul Ciechanowski
Bessie Young
Jochen Gensichen

Funding

RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF LIAISON PSYCHIATRY IN PRIMARY CARER01MH041739 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KATON, WAYNE J · 1987 to 2010
$6.6M
Quality Improvement of School Mental Health ServicesK08MH069741 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KATAOKA, SHERYL H · 2004 to 2008
$769k
NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH069741NIMH NIH HHS MH041739NIMH NIH HHS MH069741NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH041739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine whether patients who received a multicondition collaborative care intervention for chronic illnesses and depression had greater improvement in self-care knowledge and efficacy, and whether greater knowledge and self-efficacy was positively associated with improved target outcomes. A randomized controlled trial with 214 patients with comorbid depression and poorly controlled diabetes and/or coronary heart disease tested a 12-month team-based intervention that combined self-management support and collaborative care management. At 6 and 12 month outcomes the intervention group showed significant improvements over the usual care group in confidence in ability to follow through with medical regimens important to managing their conditions and to maintain lifestyle changes even during times of stress. Improvements in self care-efficacy were significantly related to improvements in depression, and early improvements in confidence to maintain lifestyle changes even during times of stress explained part of the observed subsequent improvements in depression.

Indexed as

Self EfficacyAgedBlood GlucoseBlood PressureChronic DiseaseCoronary DiseaseDepressionDepressive DisorderDiabetes MellitusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLipoproteins, LDLMaleBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinLipoproteins, LDL

Identifiers

PMID23398269
PMCPMC3628828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.