ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2013
A support vector machine model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in patients with sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and feasibility of support vector machine (SVM) modeling in predicting non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) status in patients with SLN-positive breast cancer. Clinicopathological data were collected from 201 cases with sentinel lymph node biopsy breast cancer and included patient age, tumor size, histological type and grade, vascular invasion, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, CerbB2 status, size and number of positive SLNs, number of negative SLNs, and positive SLN membrane invasion. Feature vector selection was based on a combination of statistical filtration and model-dependent screening. The arbitrary combination with the smallest p value for SVM input was selected, the predicative results of the model were evaluated by a 10-fold cross validation, and a training model was established. Using SLN-positive patients as a double-blind test set, 85 patients were input into the model to analyze its sensitivity and specificity. The combination with the highest cross-validation accuracy was selected for the SVM model and consisted of the following: the number and size of positive SLNs, the number of negative SLNs, and the membrane invasion of positive SLNs. The training accuracy of the model established with the four variables was 92 %, and its cross-validation veracity was 87.6 %. The accuracy of an 85-patient double-blind test of the SVM model was 91.8 %. In conclusion, this SVM model is an accurate and feasible method for the prediction of NSLN status in SLN-positive breast cancer and is conducive to guide clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23397544What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.