Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23397499›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2013

Phase Ib trial of the Toll-like receptor 9 agonist IMO-2055 in combination with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and cetuximab as first-line palliative treatment in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Jean-Pascal Machiels, Marie-Christine Kaminsky, Ulrich Keller, Tim H Brümmendorf, Thomas Goddemeier, Ulf Forssmann, Jean-Pierre Delord

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. TLR9: A Double-Dealing Toll-Like Receptor.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Therapeutic applications of toll-like receptors (TLRs) agonists in AML.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Toll-like receptor-agonist-based therapies for respiratory viral diseases: thinking outside the cell.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Toll-Like Receptor 9 Agonists in Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Approach to the Patient with Recurrent/Metastatic Disease.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. The emerging role of immunotherapy in colorectal cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Jean-Pascal MachielsService d'Oncologie Médicale, Centre du Cancer, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale (IREC, MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium, Jean-Pascal.Machiels@uclouvain.be.
Marie-Christine Kaminsky
Ulrich Keller
Tim H Brümmendorf
Thomas Goddemeier
Ulf Forssmann
Jean-Pierre Delord
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEDélégation Centre-Est · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEMerck (Germany) · DEMerck Serono (Switzerland) · CHUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis Phase Ib trial assessed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of the Toll-like receptor 9 agonist IMO-2055 combined with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and cetuximab (PFE) as first-line palliative treatment in patients with relapsed and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

methodsA standard 3+3 study design was used. Patients were sequentially enrolled to be treated with IMO-2055 (0.16, 0.32, or 0.48 mg/kg/day; days 1, 8, 15), 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m(2)/day; days 1-4), cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)/day; day 1) and cetuximab (400 mg/m(2)/day first dose; then 250 mg/m(2)/day; days 1, 8, 15) every 3 weeks.

resultsThirteen patients received IMO-2055. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; ie, any Grade [G]3/4 treatment-related adverse events [TEAEs] in cycle 1) occurred in 2/4 patients treated with IMO-2055 0.32 mg/kg (G4 hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia [n=1]; G4 septicemia, hyperthermia, febrile neutropenia, and G3 hypotension [n=1]). In the IMO-2055 0.16-mg/kg expansion cohort, 1 patient experienced DLTs of G3 sepsis, bacteremia, and hyperthermia. The most common G ≥ 3 TEAEs were neutropenia (n=9; not including febrile neutropenia [n=1]), hypokalemia (n=5), and hypomagnesemia (n=4). Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 8 patients, including 4 with SAEs considered IMO-2055 related; 1 of these patients died. Best response achieved overall was partial response in 3 patients and stable disease in 9 patients. The overall safety profile led to early trial termination; the safety monitoring committee did not confirm the MTD (formally IMO-2055 0.16 mg/kg).

conclusionsRegimens combining IMO-2055 and PFE cannot be recommended for further development in R/M SCCHN patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabCisplatinFemaleFluorouracilHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabCisplatinFluorouracilIMO-2055OligonucleotidesTLR9 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 9

Identifiers

PMID23397499
OpenAlexW2045573223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.