Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23396860›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2013

Preventive evolutionary medicine of cancers.

Michael E Hochberg, Frédéric Thomas, Eric Assenat, Urszula Hibner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Is adaptive therapy natural?PLoS biology · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clone wars: the evolution of therapeutic resistance in cancer.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Peto's paradox and the promise of comparative oncology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  9. Peto's paradox and human cancers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Evolutionary foundations for cancer biology.Evolutionary applications · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael E HochbergISEM, UMR5554 CNRS/UM2/IRD, Université Montpellier 2 Montpellier, France ; The Santa Fe Institute Santa Fe, NM, USA ; CREEC, Université Montpellier 2 Montpellier, France.
Frédéric Thomas
Eric Assenat
Urszula Hibner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary theory predicts that once an individual reaches an age of sufficiently low Darwinian fitness, (s)he will have reduced chances of keeping cancerous lesions in check. While we clearly need to better understand the emergence of precursor states and early malignancies as well as their mitigation by the microenvironment and tissue architecture, we argue that lifestyle changes and preventive therapies based in an evolutionary framework, applied to identified high-risk populations before incipient neoplasms become clinically detectable and chemoresistant lineages emerge, are currently the most reliable way to control or eliminate early tumours. Specifically, the relatively low levels of (epi)genetic heterogeneity characteristic of many if not most incipient lesions will mean a relatively limited set of possible adaptive traits and associated costs compared to more advanced cancers, and thus a more complete and predictable understanding of treatment options and outcomes. We propose a conceptual model for preventive treatments and discuss the many associated challenges.

Indexed as

cancerchemotherapyevolutionevolutionary cell biologylifestylemicroenvironmentpreventative evolutionary medicineprevention

Identifiers

PMID23396860
PMCPMC3567478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.