ArticleCurrent bladder dysfunction reports2013
Mixed Incontinence: How Best to Manage It?
Article in Current bladder dysfunction reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes and safety of duloxetine and tolterodine combination in the treatment of mixed-type urinary incontinence: A single-arm retrospective study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Impact of Urinary Incontinence at 5-10 Years After a Singleton Birth.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cough-Induced Detrusor Overactivity-Outcome after Conservative and Surgical Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Management of mixed urinary incontinence: IUGA committee opinion.International urogynecology journal · 2024Review
- Efficacy of mace (Arils ofIntegrative medicine research · 2018Article
- Mixed urinary incontinence: what first?Current urology reports · 2015Review
- Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Mixed Urinary Incontinence in Women.Reviews in urology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although common in women, mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) is under-reported and under-treated. It is linked to concomitant disturbances, which may be due to childbirth, ageing, or other medical conditions, in the complex bladder-urethra coordinated system of urine storage and emptying. Primary care physicians can evaluate MUI through history and simple clinical assessment or they can avail of more complex device and tools, such as urodynamic assessment. There is a wide range of therapeutic options. The recent proliferation of new drug treatments and surgical devices for urinary incontinence offers innovative strategies for therapy but products risk being introduced without long-term safety and efficacy assessment. Direct-to-consumer advertising has increased public awareness of MUI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.