ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2013
When does adoption of health information technology by physician practices lead to use by physicians within the practice?
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Health professionals' acceptance of mobile-based clinical guideline application in a resource-limited setting: using a modified UTAUT model.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluation Methods in Clinical Health Technologies: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Review
- Adoption of Patient-Reported Outcomes by Health Systems and Physician Practices in the USA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- The design and evaluation of a novel algorithm for automated preference card optimization.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Use of My Health Record by Clinicians in the Emergency Department: An Analysis of Log Data.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
- Article
- Digitalization and Physician Learning: Individual Practice, Organizational Context, and Social Norm.The Journal of continuing education in the health professions · 2020Article
- Measuring Electronic Health Record Use in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2018Article
- Exploring Attributes of High-Value Primary Care.Annals of family medicine · 2017Article
- Improving Care Transitions Management: Examining the Role of Accountable Care Organization Participation and Expanded Electronic Health Record Functionality.Health services research · 2017Article
- Increased Health Information Technology Adoption and Use Among Small Primary Care Physician Practices Over Time: A National Cohort Study.Annals of family medicine · 2017Article
- Inadequate Systems to Support Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Article
- The Exnovation of Chronic Care Management Processes by Physician Organizations.The Milbank quarterly · 2016Article
- Primary Care Physician Designation and Response to Clinical Decision Support Reminders: A Cross-Sectional Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2016Article
- Physician practice participation in accountable care organizations: the emergence of the unicorn.Health services research · 2014Article
- Factors affecting electronic medical record system adoption in small korean hospitals.Healthcare informatics research · 2014Article
- Awareness, knowledge, attitude, and skills regarding telemedicine among Syrian healthcare providers: A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe sought to determine the extent to which adoption of health information technology (HIT) by physician practices may differ from the extent of use by individual physicians, and to examine factors associated with adoption and use. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing cross-sectional survey data from the National Study of Small and Medium-Sized Physician Practices (July 2007-March 2009), we examined the extent to which organizational capabilities and external incentives were associated with the adoption of five key HIT functionalities by physician practices and with use of those functionalities by individual physicians.
resultsThe rate of physician practices adopting any of the five HIT functionalities was 34.1%. When practices adopted HIT functionalities, on average, about one in seven physicians did not use those functionalities. One physician in five did not use prompts and reminders following adoption by their practice. After controlling for other factors, both adoption of HIT by practices and use of HIT by individual physicians were higher in primary care practices and larger practices. Practices reporting an emphasis on patient-centered management were not more likely than others to adopt, but their physicians were more likely to use HIT. DISCUSSION: Larger practices were most likely to have adopted HIT, but other factors, including specialty mix and self-reported patient-centered management, had a stronger influence on the use of HIT once adopted.
conclusionsAdoption of HIT by practices does not mean that physicians will use the HIT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.