Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23395283›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2013

A linear programming approach to reconstructing subcellular structures from confocal images for automated generation of representative 3D cellular models.

Scott T Wood, Brian C Dean, Delphine Dean

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott T WoodDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0905, USA. stwood@clemson.edu
Brian C Dean
Delphine Dean
Clemson University · US

Funding

Cardiac-Cell Mechanics at the Single-Cell Level: Properties and InteractionsK25HL092228 · NHLBI · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI DEAN, DELPHINE · 2009 to 2013
$813k
NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL 092228NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL092228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a novel computer vision algorithm to analyze 3D stacks of confocal images of fluorescently stained single cells. The goal of the algorithm is to create representative in silico model structures that can be imported into finite element analysis software for mechanical characterization. Segmentation of cell and nucleus boundaries is accomplished via standard thresholding methods. Using novel linear programming methods, a representative actin stress fiber network is generated by computing a linear superposition of fibers having minimum discrepancy compared with an experimental 3D confocal image. Qualitative validation is performed through analysis of seven 3D confocal image stacks of adherent vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) grown in 2D culture. The presented method is able to automatically generate 3D geometries of the cell's boundary, nucleus, and representative F-actin network based on standard cell microscopy data. These geometries can be used for direct importation and implementation in structural finite element models for analysis of the mechanics of a single cell to potentially speed discoveries in the fields of regenerative medicine, mechanobiology, and drug discovery.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, BiologicalComputer SimulationHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, ConfocalPattern Recognition, AutomatedProgramming, LinearReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySubcellular Fractions

Identifiers

PMID23395283
PMCPMC3626120
OpenAlexW2079276827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.