Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23394586›Full record

ArticlePatient safety in surgery2013

Sutures versus staples for wound closure in orthopaedic surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Jesse A Slade Shantz, James Vernon, Saam Morshed, Jeff Leiter, Gregory Stranges

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01146236 (Sutures vs Staples for Wound Closure in Orthopaedic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01146236 nacompletednot on this map

Sutures vs Staples for Wound Closure in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2010 to 2013Enrolled247ConditionsSurgical Wound InfectionArmsSutures, Staples
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. A prospective randomized comparison of two skin closure techniques in acetabular fracture surgery.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2014
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Complication rate of different wound closures after primary hip arthroplasty - A survey of 373 patients.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2018
    Article
  12. Comparing Steri-Strip and surgical staple wound closures after primary total knee arthroplasties.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jesse A Slade ShantzOrthopedic Trauma Institute, University of California, 2550 23rd Street, Building 9, 2nd Floor, 94110, San Francisco, CA, USA. jshantz2@gmail.com.
James Vernon
Saam Morshed
Jeff Leiter
Gregory Stranges
University of Manitoba · CAPan Am Clinic · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the spectrum of surgical decision-making, wound closure material is often an afterthought. However, the findings of a recent meta-analysis suggest that the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) is increased by using staples to close surgical wounds. Less clear is the effect of closure material on the incidence of non-infectious wound complications.The aim of this study was to compare sutures and staples in terms of: incidence of wound complications to determine the sample size for a definitive trial comparing wound closure methods.

methodsEligible adult orthopaedic patients were randomized to have wounds closed with sutures or staples. Time for skin closure was recorded. Wounds were assessed for complications for six weeks. The incidence of complications was compared using Fisher's exact test. Time to close and pain with removal of closure material were compared using a Student's t-test.

resultsThe total number of patients reporting a wound complication was 59 of 148 patients completing six-week followup (41%), with no differennce between sutures and staples (RR = 0.77, CI = 0.52-1.14). The time to close wounds was shorter in the staple group (mean=4.8 min, CI = 2.6-7.1) than the suture group (mean=12 min, CI = 7.9-16). Patients in the staple group (mean=3.7, CI =2.8-4.6) reported more pain with removal than suture group (mean=2.5, CI =1.6-3.4).

conclusionsThis study suggests that 42% of patients report a wound complication with no difference between sutures and staples. It was demonstrated that suturing skin requires more time and staples are more painful to remove.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01146236 (registered June 14, 2010).

Identifiers

PMID23394586
PMCPMC3598732
OpenAlexW2155181452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.