Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2013
A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 470 papers, 24 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy
Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: Endovascular Interventions vs Standard Medical Treatment
A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Aureva Transcranial Ultrasound Device With Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRUST)
Who cites it
470 citing papers in PubMed, 24 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,373 citations in OpenAlex.
- Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Mechanical thrombectomy with retrievable stents and aspiration catheters for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2021Pooled it
- Endovascular thrombectomy and intra-arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Guidelines for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Japan, the Fourth Edition, March 2020: A Guideline from the Japan Stroke Society, the Japan Neurosurgical Society, and the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2021Guideline
- Pooled it
- Access-Site Complications in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Review of Prospective Trials.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Pooled it
- Neuroimaging in Randomized, Multi-Center Clinical Trials of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Public Approval of Exception From Informed Consent in Emergency Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Community Consultation Surveys.JAMA network open · 2019Pooled it
- Endovascular Thrombectomy as a Means to Improve Survival in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis.JAMA neurology · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of emergency endovascular therapy using mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke: implications for service delivery.Irish journal of medical science · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Long-Term Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2019Pooled it
- Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Octogenarians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Pooled it
- Percutaneous vascular interventions versus intravenous thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Recanalisation therapies for wake-up stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of economic evaluations on stent-retriever thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.Journal of neurology · 2018Pooled it
- Utility of perfusion imaging in acute stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Endovascular Treatment Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Quantitative Review and Meta-Analysis of 21 Randomized Trials.Molecular neurobiology · 2017Pooled it
410 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhether brain imaging can identify patients who are most likely to benefit from therapies for acute ischemic stroke and whether endovascular thrombectomy improves clinical outcomes in such patients remains unclear.
methodsIn this study, we randomly assigned patients within 8 hours after the onset of large-vessel, anterior-circulation strokes to undergo mechanical embolectomy (Merci Retriever or Penumbra System) or receive standard care. All patients underwent pretreatment computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Randomization was stratified according to whether the patient had a favorable penumbral pattern (substantial salvageable tissue and small infarct core) or a nonpenumbral pattern (large core or small or absent penumbra). We assessed outcomes using the 90-day modified Rankin scale, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (dead).
resultsAmong 118 eligible patients, the mean age was 65.5 years, the mean time to enrollment was 5.5 hours, and 58% had a favorable penumbral pattern. Revascularization in the embolectomy group was achieved in 67% of the patients. Ninety-day mortality was 21%, and the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 4%; neither rate differed across groups. Among all patients, mean scores on the modified Rankin scale did not differ between embolectomy and standard care (3.9 vs. 3.9, P=0.99). Embolectomy was not superior to standard care in patients with either a favorable penumbral pattern (mean score, 3.9 vs. 3.4; P=0.23) or a nonpenumbral pattern (mean score, 4.0 vs. 4.4; P=0.32). In the primary analysis of scores on the 90-day modified Rankin scale, there was no interaction between the pretreatment imaging pattern and treatment assignment (P=0.14).
conclusionsA favorable penumbral pattern on neuroimaging did not identify patients who would differentially benefit from endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke, nor was embolectomy shown to be superior to standard care. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; MR RESCUE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00389467.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.