Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2013
Liver transplantation in the critically ill: a multicenter Canadian retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- One-year functional and neuropsychological outcomes of liver transplant recipients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation.Canadian liver journal · 2026Article
- Management of the acute on chronic liver failure in the intensive care unit.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Review
- Extracorporeal liver support and liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic liver failure.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Review
- Liver Transplantation in the Context of Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF): Where Do We Stand in 2025?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025Review
- Liver transplant selection criteria and outcomes in critically ill patients with ACLF.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2024Article
- Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure: The Role of Prognostic Scores in a Single-Center Experience.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
- Outcomes of Liver Transplant Recipients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Based on EASL-CLIF Consortium Definition: A Single-center Study.Transplantation direct · 2020Article
- Approaches for patients with very high MELD scores.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2019Review
- Proceedings from the 2018 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver Single Topic Conference-Decompensated cirrhosis: from clinic to transplant.Canadian liver journal · 2019Review
- Liver transplantation for critically ill cirrhotic patients: Overview and pragmatic proposals.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Acute on Chronic Liver Failure Based on EASL-CLIF Diagnostic Criteria.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology · 2018Article
- Fibroblast growth factors 19 and 21 in acute liver damage.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Review
- Prognosis of cirrhotic patients admitted to intensive care unit: a meta-analysis.Annals of intensive care · 2017Article
- Improving outcomes for transplantation of critically ill patients with cirrhosis?Clinical liver disease · 2017Review
- Is palliative care appropriate in the liver transplant candidate?Clinical liver disease · 2015Review
- Postoperative resource utilization and survival among liver transplant recipients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease score ≥ 40: A retrospective cohort study.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2015Article
- Article
- The utility of the SOFA score for predicting mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients receiving liver transplantation.Critical care (London, England) · 2013Article
- Outcomes of liver transplant recipients with high MELD scores: an experience from a Canadian centre.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCritically ill cirrhosis patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) often receive prioritization for organ allocation. Identification of patients most likely to benefit is essential. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score can predict 90-day mortality in critically ill recipients of LT and whether it can predict receipt of LT among critically ill cirrhosis listed awaiting LT.
methodsWe performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study consisting of two datasets: (a) all critically-ill cirrhosis patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission before LT at five transplant centers in Canada from 2000 through 2009 (one site, 1990 through 2009), and (b) critically ill cirrhosis patients receiving LT from ICU (n = 115) and those listed but not receiving LT before death (n = 106) from two centers where complete data were available.
resultsIn the first dataset, 198 critically ill cirrhosis patients receiving LT (mean (SD) age 53 (10) years, 66% male, median (IQR) model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) 34 (26-39)) were included. Mean (SD) SOFA scores at ICU admission, at 48 hours, and at LT were 12.5 (4), 13.0 (5), and 14.0 (4). Survival at 90 days was 84% (n = 166). In multivariable analysis, only older age was independently associated with reduced 90-day survival (odds ratio (OR), 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.14; P = 0.013). SOFA score did not predict 90-day mortality at any time. In the second dataset, 47.9% (n = 106) of cirrhosis patients listed for LT died in the ICU waiting for LT. In multivariable analysis, higher SOFA at 48 hours after admission was independently associated with lower probability of receiving LT (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.97; P = 0.006). When including serum lactate and SOFA at 48 hours in the final model, elevated lactate (at 48 hours) was also significantly associated with lower likelihood of receiving LT (0.32; 0.17 to 0.61; P = 0.001).
conclusionsSOFA appears poor at predicting 90-day survival in critically ill cirrhosis patients after LT, but higher SOFA score and elevated lactate 48 hours after ICU admission are associated with a lower probability receiving LT. Older critically ill cirrhosis patients (older than 60) receiving LT have worse 90-day survival and should be considered for LT with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.