ArticleThe Australasian medical journal2011
Prescription writing practices in a rural tertiary care hospital in Western Maharashtra, India.
Article in The Australasian medical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prescription writing pattern among the dental practitioners of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Assessment of prescription pattern and prescription error in outpatient Department at Tertiary Care District Hospital, Central Nepal.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2019Article
- Evaluation of Hand Written and Computerized Out-Patient Prescriptions in Urban Part of Central Gujarat.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- Imprudent Gastro-protective Approach in Majority of Specialists' Clinics of a Tertiary Hospital.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- Analysis of Out Door Patients' Prescriptions According to World Health Organization (WHO) Prescribing Indicators Among Private Hospitals in Western India.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2015Article
- Assessment of Quality of Prescription Writing among Dental and Medical Students and Practitioners in Kerala.Journal of natural science, biology, and medicineArticle
- Prescription errors in cancer chemotherapy: Omissions supersede potentially harmful errors.Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeuticsArticle
- Investigating an outbreak of acute fever in Chuuk, Federated States of Micronesia.Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSARArticle
- Evaluation of skill-based training program on rational drug treatment for medical interns.Journal of family medicine and primary careArticle
- Evaluation of out-patient prescriptions in rural part of central Gujarat.Journal of family medicine and primary careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrescription is a written order from physician to pharmacist which contains name of drug, its dose and its method of dispensing and advice over consuming it. The frequency of drug prescription errors is high. Prescribing error contributes significantly towards adverse drug events. The present study was undertaken to understand the current prescription writing practices and to detect the common errors in them at a tertiary health care centre situated in a rural area of Western Maharashtra, India.
methodA cross sectional study was conducted at a tertiary level hospital located at a rural area of Maharashtra state, India during October 2009-March 2010. 499 prescriptions coming to medical store during period of one month were considered for data analysis. Important information regarding the patient, doctor, drug and the general description of the prescription were obtained.
resultsAll the prescriptions were on the hospital pad. A significant number of the prescriptions (n=88, 17.6%) were written in illegible handwriting and not easily readable. The name, age and sex of the patient were mentioned is majority of the prescriptions. All the prescriptions (100%) failed to demonstrate the presence of address, height and weight of the patient. Only the brand name of the drugs was mentioned in all the prescriptions with none of them having the generic name. The strength, quantity and route of administration of the drug were found on 73.1%, 65.3% and 75.2% prescriptions.
conclusionThere are widespread errors in prescription writing by the doctors. Educational intervention programs and use of computer can substantially contribute in the lowering of such errors. A short course on prescription writing before the medical student enters the clinical field and strict monitoring by the administrative authorities may also help alleviate the problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.