Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23392983›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2013

Is the transvaginal route appropriate for intra-abdominal NOTES procedures? Experience and follow-up of 222 cases.

Hamid Mofid, Alice Emmermann, Margret Alm, Hans-Albrecht von Waldenfels, Conrad Felixmüller, Carsten Zornig

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in Germany: Data from the German NOTES registry].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Transvaginal appendectomy: a systematic review.Minimally invasive surgery · 2014
    Review
  15. Transvaginal route for kidney extraction in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hamid MofidDepartment of Surgery, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Orchideenstieg 14, 22297 Hamburg, Germany. hamid@mofid.de
Alice Emmermann
Margret Alm
Hans-Albrecht von Waldenfels
Conrad Felixmüller
Carsten Zornig
Israelitisches Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2007, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has been applied in humans. We performed this prospective study to evaluate the transvaginal route in terms of risks, complication rate, and long-term side effects such as dyspareunia.

methodsFrom June 2007 to September 2011, we performed 222 transvaginal hybrid NOTES procedures: 220 transvaginal cholecystectomies (TVC) and 2 transvaginal appendectomies (TVA). All patients were asked to present to our associated gynecologists within 1 week for an examination. After at least 3 months, the patients were interviewed using a standard questionnaire.

resultsAll operations could be successfully performed in this technique except two cases, which were converted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The only intraoperative complication was the puncture of the urine bladder. We observed two postoperative complications: one biliary fistula 3 days after TVC, and one abscess in the Douglas pouch 3 weeks after TVC. The gynecological examinations revealed no abnormalities. The interview (median postoperative time, 6 months) with a follow-up rate of 93 % revealed no pain in the pelvis, dyspareunia, or sexual dysfunction after TVC.

conclusionsThe transvaginal route is appropriate for NOTES procedures; there is only a minor and acceptable rate of intra- and postoperative morbidity.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAppendectomyCholecystectomyDyspareuniaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansMiddle AgedNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID23392983
OpenAlexW2065106252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.