ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2013
Improving thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in Lombardia stroke centers.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify which factors are able to limit or hamper the access to systemic thrombolysis (evTPA) in Lombardia to define corrective interventions. We analyzed 1,015 patients with ischemic stroke admitted to emergency departments (ED) participating to the Lombardia Stroke Unit Registry and eligible for evTPA; 303 (29.9%) patients were treated with evTPA (evTPA+ group) and 712 (70.1%) were not (evTPA- group). We collected case-mix and stroke care process variables.The evTPA+ group was characterized by a shorter ED arrival time, a greater neurological impairment, a more chance to be admitted to ED linked to comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and a shorter waiting time to access to diagnostic procedures. The chance to be treated with evTPA was greater if neurological evaluation anticipated neuroimaging (p = 0.0003). The multivariate analysis confirmed that the admission to ED linked to CSC (OR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.39-4.48, p < 0.0001) and neurological evaluation performed before neuroimaging (OR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.35-4.04, p = 0.002) increased the probability to receive rtPA. The evTPA treatment is strictly dependent on pre-hospital and ED care process phases and strongly influenced by the degree of stroke severity. Door-to-needle time is shorter in patients with a greater stroke severity and a shorter ED arrival time. A 24-h/week availability of the neurologist in ED can increase the percentage of thrombolysis optimizing the selection of patients and the timing of the diagnostic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23392898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.