Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23392837›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2013

[Importance of perimetric differential diagnostics in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma].

C Erb, K Göbel

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C ErbAugenklinik am Wittenbergplatz, Kleiststr. 23-26, 10787, Berlin, Deutschland. glaukom.berlin@yahoo.de
K Göbel
Schlosspark-Klinik · DEWittenberg University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional deficits in glaucomatous optic neuropathy are, apart from other disturbances in the visual field, typically detected with achromatic perimetry as a well accepted gold standard. With the development of new perimetric devices and strategies (e.g. short wave perimetry, frequency doubling perimetry and flicker perimetry) individually different patterns of scotomas in the different perimetric devices could be recognized. The reasons for this could be a different sensitivity reaction of the ganglion cell subpopulations to an increased intraocular pressure as well as an influence of the underlying systemic diseases. To obtain a differentiated detection of the functional loss in the visual field in glaucoma, the use of different perimetric methods seems to be reasonable and helpful.

Indexed as

Flicker FusionVisual FieldsDiagnosis, DifferentialGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansOptic Nerve DiseasesPhotic StimulationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID23392837
OpenAlexW190822223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.