ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2013
Investigation on the effect of static magnetic field up to 15 mT on the viability and proliferation rate of rat bone marrow stem cells.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influences of physical stimulations on the migration and differentiation of Schwann cells involved in peripheral nerve repair.Cell adhesion & migration · 2025Review
- A 0.2 T-0.4 T Static Magnetic Field Improves the Bone Quality of Mice Subjected to Hindlimb Unloading and Reloading Through the Dual Regulation of BMSCs via Iron Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Static magnetic fields in regenerative medicine.APL bioengineering · 2024Review
- Application of magnetism in tissue regeneration: recent progress and future prospects.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- Research on microbial community structure and treatment of dye wastewater with the enhancement of activated sludge by magnetic field at low temperature.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Static Magnetic Field Promotes Proliferation, Migration, Differentiation, and AKT Activation of Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.Cells, tissues, organs · 2023Article
- Biological Impact of γ-FeBiosensors · 2022Article
- Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Review
- Application of magnetic nanoparticles in cell therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Review
- The Static Magnetic Field Remotely Boosts the Efficiency of Doxorubicin through Modulating ROS Behaviors.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Magnetic targeting as a strategy to enhance therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stromal cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2017Review
- Inhibition of Viability, Proliferation, Cytokines Secretion, Surface Antigen Expression, and Adipogenic and Osteogenic Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells by Seven-Day Exposure to 0.5 T Static Magnetic Fields.Stem cells international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This investigation was performed to evaluate the influence of the static magnetic field up to 15 mT on the viability and proliferation rate of rat bone marrow stem cells. Cells from passage 5 were trypsinized, and a cell suspension was prepared. The cells were counted and cultured in 25-cm(2) flasks. They were incubated for 1 d, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and then exposed with different intensities of static magnetic field (4, 7, and 15 mT) at different exposure times (24, 48, 72, and 96 h). Cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline, trypsinized, and a cell suspension was prepared separately from each flask. To investigate the viability and proliferation rates of treated cells, staining with Trypan blue and counting were performed with an optical microscope. The mean number of whole cells and living cells was considered as proliferation and survival rates, respectively. Increasing of intensity and time of static magnetic field exposure decreased the viability percent and proliferation rate in treated groups compared with corresponded control. However, reduced cell viability, where this occurred, is exclusively due to apoptosis since necrosis is never observed by others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23392752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.