Trial reportDer Nervenarzt2014
[Length of hospitalization for inpatient treatment of depression. Results of a multicentre study on the effects of a new treatment model].
Trial report in Der Nervenarzt, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with depression are treated for a relatively long period as inpatients in Germany. A new treatment model with symptom-orientated release management, post-hospitalization treatment and standardized referral to outpatient therapists could be suitable to specifically shorten the hospital stay of patients who have already profited sufficiently from treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of a new treatment method (intervention group) with hospitalized depressive patients in comparison to a standard protocol (treatment-as-usual control group) on the length of stay as part of a pragmatic randomized, controlled multicentre study. The evaluation was made using covariance analysis.
resultsOf the 202 randomized patients 184 could be included in the analysis. The estimated marginal mean of the length of stay (n = 83) was 57.3 days (range 1-305 days, SE = 3.8) in the intervention group and (n = 101) 57.6 days (range: 6-196 days, SE = 3.5) in the control group. There were no significant statistical differences between the groups (p = 0.966).
conclusionsAn effect of the new treatment model on the inpatient length of hospital stay in depressive patients could not be demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23392267What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.