ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2013
Imaging primary mouse sarcomas after radiation therapy using cathepsin-activatable fluorescent imaging agents.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant Therapies Do Not Reduce Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression or EGFR-Targeted Fluorescence in a Murine Model of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas.Molecular imaging and biology · 2024Article
- Fluorescence Image-Guided Surgery - a Perspective on Contrast Agent Development.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020Article
- National Cancer Institute Alliance for nanotechnology in cancer-Catalyzing research and translation toward novel cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2019Review
- Article
- Upcoming imaging concepts and their impact on treatment planning and treatment response in radiation oncology.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2018Article
- Polymer Therapeutics: Biomarkers and New Approaches for Personalized Cancer Treatment.Journal of personalized medicine · 2018Review
- Imaging the Tumor Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017Review
- Advances in fluorescent-image guided surgery.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
- A mouse-human phase 1 co-clinical trial of a protease-activated fluorescent probe for imaging cancer.Science translational medicine · 2016Article
- Tailoring Adjuvant Radiation Therapy by Intraoperative Imaging to Detect Residual Cancer.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2015Review
- Enzymatically activated near infrared nanoprobes based on amphiphilic block copolymers for optical detection of cancer.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2015Article
- Methods to generate genetically engineered mouse models of soft tissue sarcoma.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2015Article
- Bioluminescent imaging of HPV-positive oral tumor growth and its response to image-guided radiotherapy.Cancer research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCathepsin-activated fluorescent probes can detect tumors in mice and in canine patients. We previously showed that these probes can detect microscopic residual sarcoma in the tumor bed of mice during gross total resection. Many patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and other tumors undergo radiation therapy (RT) before surgery. This study assesses the effect of RT on the ability of cathepsin-activated probes to differentiate between normal and cancerous tissue. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A genetically engineered mouse model of STS was used to generate primary hind limb sarcomas that were treated with hypofractionated RT. Mice were injected intravenously with cathepsin-activated fluorescent probes, and various tissues, including the tumor, were imaged using a hand-held imaging device. Resected tumor and normal muscle samples were harvested to assess cathepsin expression by Western blot. Uptake of activated probe was analyzed by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Parallel in vitro studies using mouse sarcoma cells were performed.
resultsRT of primary STS in mice and mouse sarcoma cell lines caused no change in probe activation or cathepsin protease expression. Increasing radiation dose resulted in an upward trend in probe activation. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence showed that a substantial proportion of probe-labeled cells were CD11b-positive tumor-associated immune cells.
conclusionsIn this primary murine model of STS, RT did not affect the ability of cathepsin-activated probes to differentiate between tumor and normal muscle. Cathepsin-activated probes labeled tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages. Our results suggest that it would be feasible to include patients who have received preoperative RT in clinical studies evaluating cathepsin-activated imaging probes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.