Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23391816›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2013

Imaging primary mouse sarcomas after radiation therapy using cathepsin-activatable fluorescent imaging agents.

Kyle C Cuneo, Jeffrey K Mito, Melodi P Javid, Jorge M Ferrer, Yongbaek Kim, W David Lee, Moungi G Bawendi, Brian E Brigman, David G Kirsch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Fluorescence Image-Guided Surgery - a Perspective on Contrast Agent Development.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Imaging the Tumor Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  8. Advances in fluorescent-image guided surgery.Annals of translational medicine · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyle C CuneoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Jeffrey K Mito
Melodi P Javid
Jorge M Ferrer
Yongbaek Kim
W David Lee
Moungi G Bawendi
Brian E Brigman
David G Kirsch
Duke University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USSeoul National University · KR

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007171 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KONTOS, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2021
$31.2M
Independent Scientist Award for Radiation ResearchK02AI093866 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KIRSCH, DAVID GUY · 2011 to 2015
$501k
NIAID NIH HHS K02 AI093866NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCathepsin-activated fluorescent probes can detect tumors in mice and in canine patients. We previously showed that these probes can detect microscopic residual sarcoma in the tumor bed of mice during gross total resection. Many patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and other tumors undergo radiation therapy (RT) before surgery. This study assesses the effect of RT on the ability of cathepsin-activated probes to differentiate between normal and cancerous tissue. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A genetically engineered mouse model of STS was used to generate primary hind limb sarcomas that were treated with hypofractionated RT. Mice were injected intravenously with cathepsin-activated fluorescent probes, and various tissues, including the tumor, were imaged using a hand-held imaging device. Resected tumor and normal muscle samples were harvested to assess cathepsin expression by Western blot. Uptake of activated probe was analyzed by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Parallel in vitro studies using mouse sarcoma cells were performed.

resultsRT of primary STS in mice and mouse sarcoma cell lines caused no change in probe activation or cathepsin protease expression. Increasing radiation dose resulted in an upward trend in probe activation. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence showed that a substantial proportion of probe-labeled cells were CD11b-positive tumor-associated immune cells.

conclusionsIn this primary murine model of STS, RT did not affect the ability of cathepsin-activated probes to differentiate between tumor and normal muscle. Cathepsin-activated probes labeled tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages. Our results suggest that it would be feasible to include patients who have received preoperative RT in clinical studies evaluating cathepsin-activated imaging probes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternCathepsinsDiagnosis, DifferentialFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesHindlimbMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalMuscle, SkeletalSarcoma, ExperimentalTissue DistributionWhole-Body IrradiationCathepsinsFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID23391816
PMCPMC3923491
OpenAlexW2063927214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.