Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23391695›Full record

ReviewJournal of innate immunity2013

Autophagy and viruses: adversaries or allies?

Xiaonan Dong, Beth Levine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of innate immunity, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Autophagy ReceptorViruses · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution of innate immunity: lessons from mammalian models shaping our current view of insect immunity.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaonan DongCenter for Autophagy Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Beth Levine

Funding

WRCE Nonhuman Primate CoreU54AI057156 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI WALKER, DAVID H · 2003 to 2013
$102.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01AI151267NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057156NIAID NIH HHS U54AI057156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The autophagy pathway is an essential component of host defense against viral infection, orchestrating pathogen degradation (xenophagy), innate immune signaling, and certain aspects of adaptive immunity. Single autophagy proteins or cassettes of the core autophagy machinery can also function as antiviral factors independently of the canonical autophagy pathway. Moreover, to survive and propagate within the host, viruses have evolved a variety of strategies to evade autophagic attack and manipulate the autophagy machinery for their own benefit. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding the antiviral and proviral roles of autophagy and previously unappreciated autophagy-independent functions of autophagy-related genes.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsAutophagyHumansImmunity, InnateVirus Diseases

Identifiers

PMID23391695
PMCPMC3790331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.