Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23391516›Full record

Trial reportJournal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry2013

Modification of threat-processing in non-anxious individuals: a preliminary behavioral and ERP study.

J G Suway, L K White, R E Vanderwert, Y Bar-Haim, D S Pine, N A Fox

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of attention bias modification for anxiety: Neurophysiological indices and moderation by symptom severity.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The neural chronometry of threat-related attentional bias: Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for early and late stages of selective attentional processing.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Single-session attention bias modification and error-related brain activity.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J G SuwayDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, USA. Jngold@umd.edu
L K White
R E Vanderwert
Y Bar-Haim
D S Pine
N A Fox

Funding

Project 3: The neurobiology of adverse early care in rhesus infants....P50MH078105 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SANCHEZ, MAR M · 2009 to 2013
$9.9M
Affect &Cerebral Asymmetry: A Developmental ApproachR37HD017899 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FOX, NATHAN A · 2001 to 2010
$5.6M
Relations between attention bias to threat and negative interpretive biasF31MH085424 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI WHITE, LAUREN K · 2008 to 2011
$91k
NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD017899NICHD NIH HHS R37HD17899NIMH NIH HHS 1F31MH085424NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH085424NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH078105NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH078105-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPrevious research suggests that attention bias toward threat contributes to the development and maintenance of anxiety. The current study extends this work by mapping the neural correlates of experimentally-induced changes in attention bias. The study examines both behavioral and psychophysiological changes associated with experimentally-induced changes in threat bias.

methodsThirty-four non-anxious female adults were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: training attention toward threat or placebo control. Attention bias was assessed and trained via a modified dot-probe task. Participants completed pre- and post-training assessments of attention bias and stress reactivity. As well, EEG was collected during pre- and post-test assessment of attention bias using the dot-probe task.

resultsTraining induced significant changes in attention bias, though findings were complicated by group differences in baseline threat-bias scores. Compared to controls, those in the training group showed greater depression vulnerability to a post-training stressor and increased P2 amplitude, an ERP component associated with attention toward threat, during the dot-probe task. LIMITATIONS: Although participants were randomly assigned to groups, there were still group differences in pre-training bias scores. Also, while the use of a stress task before the initial assessment of attention bias was used to control for initial differences in stress vulnerability, this may have altered pre-bias scores since participants completed this task immediately after being stressed.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate training-induced changes in behavior and neural response patterns relevant to work on attention bias modification.

Indexed as

AdultAffectAnxietyAttentionCognitive Behavioral TherapyEvoked Potentials, VisualFacial ExpressionFemaleHumansPhotic StimulationReaction TimeStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID23391516
PMCPMC3615142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.