Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23391465›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2013

Safety and efficacy of MVA85A, a new tuberculosis vaccine, in infants previously vaccinated with BCG: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.

Michele D Tameris, Mark Hatherill, Bernard S Landry, Thomas J Scriba, Margaret Ann Snowden, Stephen Lockhart, Jacqueline E Shea, J Bruce McClain, Gregory D Hussey, Willem A Hanekom and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 604 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
604citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
74.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00953927 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Evaluation of MVA85A/AERAS-485 for Safety, Immunogenicity and Prevention of Tuberculosis in BCG-vaccinated, HIV-negative Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorAerasRan2009Enrolled2,797ConditionsTuberculosisArmsMVA85A/AERAS-485, Candida Skin Test Antigen
NCT04975178 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of MTBVAC in Healthy HIV Unexposed (HU) and HIV Exposed Uninfected (HEU) Newborns in Tuberculosis-Endemic Regions of Sub-Saharan Africa

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiofabri, S.LRan2022 to 2029Enrolled7,120ConditionsTuberculosisArmsMTBVAC, BCG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

604 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,027 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Polyketide synthase 12 is anbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Antigen 85B ofVaccines · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Targeting Latent Tuberculosis: Immunogenic Evaluation of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Antigen-experienced airway CD8Science advances · 2026
    Article
  18. Lung Resident T Cells Across the Spectrum of TB Infection and Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

544 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Michele D TamerisSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine and School of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. michele.tameris@uct.ac.za
Mark Hatherill
Bernard S Landry
Thomas J Scriba
Margaret Ann Snowden
Stephen Lockhart
Jacqueline E Shea
J Bruce McClain
Gregory D Hussey
Willem A Hanekom
Hassan Mahomed
Helen McShane
MVA85A 020 Trial Study Team
Aeras · USSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAWokingham Hospital · GBStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 090532Wellcome Trust 095540Wellcome Trust 095780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBCG vaccination provides incomplete protection against tuberculosis in infants. A new vaccine, modified Vaccinia Ankara virus expressing antigen 85A (MVA85A), was designed to enhance the protective efficacy of BCG. We aimed to assess safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of MVA85A against tuberculosis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in infants.

methodsIn our double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial, we enrolled healthy infants (aged 4–6 months) without HIV infection who had previously received BCG vaccination. We randomly allocated infants (1:1), according to an independently generated sequence with block sizes of four, to receive one intradermal dose of MVA85A or an equal volume of Candida skin test antigen as placebo at a clinical facility in a rural region near Cape Town, South Africa. We actively followed up infants every 3 months for up to 37 months. The primary study outcome was safety (incidence of adverse and serious adverse events) in all vaccinated participants, but we also assessed efficacy in a protocol-defined group of participants who received at least one dose of allocated vaccine. The primary efficacy endpoint was incident tuberculosis incorporating microbiological, radiological, and clinical criteria, and the secondary efficacy endpoint was M tuberculosis infection according to QuantiFERON TB Gold In-tube conversion (Cellestis, Australia). This trial was registered with the South African National Clinical Trials Register (DOH-27-0109-2654) and with ClinicalTrials.gov on July 31, 2009, number NCT00953927.

findingsBetween July 15, 2009, and May 4, 2011, we enrolled 2797 infants (1399 allocated MVA85A and 1398 allocated placebo). Median follow-up in the per-protocol population was 24·6 months (IQR 19·2–28·1), and did not differ between groups. More infants who received MVA85A than controls had at least one local adverse event (1251 [89%] of 1399 MVA85A recipients and 628 [45%] of 1396 controls who received the allocated intervention) but the numbers of infants with systemic adverse events (1120 [80%] and 1059 [76%]) or serious adverse events (257 [18%] and 258 (18%) did not differ between groups. None of the 648 serious adverse events in these 515 infants was related to MVA85A. 32 (2%) of 1399 MVA85A recipients met the primary efficacy endpoint (tuberculosis incidence of 1·15 per 100 person-years [95% CI 0·79 to 1·62]; with conversion in 178 [13%] of 1398 infants [95% CI 11·0 to 14·6]) as did 39 (3%) of 1395 controls (1·39 per 100 person-years [1·00 to 1·91]; with conversion in 171 [12%] of 1394 infants [10·6 to 14·1]). Efficacy against tuberculosis was 17·3% (95% CI −31·9 to 48·2) and against M tuberculosis infection was −3·8% (–28·1 to 15·9).

interpretationMVA85A was well tolerated and induced modest cell-mediated immune responses. Reasons for the absence of MVA85A efficacy against tuberculosis or M tuberculosis infection in infants need exploration.

fundingAeras, Wellcome Trust, and Oxford-Emergent Tuberculosis Consortium (OETC).

Indexed as

BCG VaccineAntigens, BacterialDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantInjections, IntradermalMaleMycobacterium tuberculosisTreatment OutcomeTuberculin TestTuberculosisTuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNAViral VaccinesAntigens, BacterialBCG VaccineMVA 85ATuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNAViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23391465
PMCPMC5424647
OpenAlexW2137633461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.