ArticleJournal of proteomics2013
A novel spectral library workflow to enhance protein identifications.
Article in Journal of proteomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced proteolytic stability and distinct mechanisms of a D-amino acid-modified antimicrobial peptide against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Denoising Search doubles the number of metabolite and exposome annotations in human plasma using an Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Comprehensive immune cell spectral library for large-scale human primary T, B, and NK cell proteomics.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Article
- Deep learning embedder method and tool for mass spectra similarity search.Journal of proteomics · 2021Article
- Article
- Cardiovascular proteomics in the era of big data: experimental and computational advances.Clinical proteomics · 2016Review
- Integration of cardiac proteome biology and medicine by a specialized knowledgebase.Circulation research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The innovations in mass spectrometry-based investigations in proteome biology enable systematic characterization of molecular details in pathophysiological phenotypes. However, the process of delineating large-scale raw proteomic datasets into a biological context requires high-throughput data acquisition and processing. A spectral library search engine makes use of previously annotated experimental spectra as references for subsequent spectral analyses. This workflow delivers many advantages, including elevated analytical efficiency and specificity as well as reduced demands in computational capacity. In this study, we created a spectral matching engine to address challenges commonly associated with a library search workflow. Particularly, an improved sliding dot product algorithm, that is robust to systematic drifts of mass measurement in spectra, is introduced. Furthermore, a noise management protocol distinguishes spectra correlation attributed from noise and peptide fragments. It enables elevated separation between target spectral matches and false matches, thereby suppressing the possibility of propagating inaccurate peptide annotations from library spectra to query spectra. Moreover, preservation of original spectra also accommodates user contributions to further enhance the quality of the library. Collectively, this search engine supports reproducible data analyses using curated references, thereby broadening the accessibility of proteomics resources to biomedical investigators. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: From protein structures to clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.