Trial reportBMC health services research2013
Case management and self-management support for frequent users with chronic disease in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01719991 (Pragmatic Evaluation of Case Management and Self-management Support for Vulnerable People With Chronic Diseases in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pragmatic Evaluation of Case Management and Self-management Support for Vulnerable People With Chronic Diseases in Primary Care
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Understanding Barriers to and Facilitators of Case Management in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.Annals of family medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Models Used to Deliver Multimodal Care for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: a Rapid Evidence Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Strategies for recruiting populations to participate in the chronic disease self-management program (CDSMP): A systematic review.Health marketing quarterlyPooled it
- The relationship between health literacy and quality of life among frequent users of health care services: a cross-sectional study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Trial
- Developing, Implementing, and Evaluating a Care Management Model for Patients With Neuromuscular Diseases: Protocol for a Participatory Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- The Power of Words: what if the health system lived up to its role in addressing frequent use of services?International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025Article
- Treating Persistent Pain: A Nurse Co-Led, Interdisciplinary Model for Primary Care.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2022Article
- Communication, Coordination, and Security for People with Multiple Sclerosis (COCOS-MS): a randomised phase II clinical trial protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Assessing Nurses' Satisfaction with Continuity of Care and the Case Management Model as an Indicator of Quality of Care in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The use of the PARIHS framework in implementation research and practice-a citation analysis of the literature.Implementation science : IS · 2020Review
- Article
- Facilitators and barriers of managing patients with multiple chronic conditions in the community: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Benefits of Advanced Practice Nursing for Its Expansion in the Spanish Context.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Review
- Optimizing clinical and organizational practice in cancer survivor transitions between specialized oncology and primary care teams: a realist evaluation of multiple case studies.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- A qualitative study of perceived needs and factors associated with the quality of care for common mental disorders in patients with chronic diseases: the perspective of primary care clinicians and patients.BMC family practice · 2016Article
- The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program: the experience of frequent users of health care services and peer leaders.Family practice · 2016Article
- Adherence to health regimens among frequent attenders of Finnish healthcare.International journal of circumpolar health · 2016Article
- Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services With Chronic Diseases: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Family Experience.Annals of family medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic diseases represent a major challenge for health care and social services. A number of people with chronic diseases require more services due to characteristics that increase their vulnerability. Given the burden of increasingly vulnerable patients on primary care, a pragmatic intervention in four Family Medicine Groups (primary care practices in Quebec, Canada) has been proposed for individuals with chronic diseases (diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, musculoskeletal diseases and/or chronic pain) who are frequent users of hospital services. The intervention combines case management by a nurse with group support meetings encouraging self-management based on the Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. The goals of this study are to: (1) analyze the implementation of the intervention in the participating practices in order to determine how the various contexts have influenced the implementation and the observed effects; (2) evaluate the proximal (self-efficacy, self-management, health habits, activation and psychological distress) and intermediate (empowerment, quality of life and health care use) effects of the intervention on patients; (3) conduct an economic analysis of the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. METHODS/
designThe analysis of the implementation will be conducted using realistic evaluation and participatory approaches within four categories of stakeholders (Family Medicine Group and health centre management, Family Medicine Group practitioners, patients and their families, health centre or community partners). The data will be obtained through individual and group interviews, project documentation reviews and by documenting the intervention. Evaluation of the effects on patients will be based on a pragmatic randomized before-after experimental design with a delayed intervention control group (six months). Economic analysis will include cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis. DISCUSSION: The integration of a case management intervention delivered by nurses and self-management group support into primary care practices has the potential to positively impact patient empowerment and quality of life and hopefully reduce the burden on health care. Decision-makers, managers and health care professionals will be aware of the factors to consider in promoting the implementation of this intervention into other primary care practices in the region and elsewhere.
trial registrationNCT01719991.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.