ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2013
Incomplete knowledge of the clinical context as a barrier to interpreting incidental genetic research findings.
Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2013Guideline
- Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know--that is not the question.BMC medical ethics · 2016Article
- The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2015Review
- Canadian Research Ethics Board Leadership Attitudes to the Return of Genetic Research Results to Individuals and Their Families.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2015Article
- Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing.American journal of human genetics · 2014Article
- Response to open peer commentaries on "do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?".The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.