Genomic incidental findings: reducing the burden to be fair.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2013
   Guideline
2. Reporting Genetic Findings to Individual Research Participants: Guidelines From the Swiss Personalized Health Network.Frontiers in genetics · 2020
   Article
3. Health Research with Big Data: Time for Systemic Oversight.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2018
   Article
4. Becoming partners, retaining autonomy: ethical considerations on the development of precision medicine.BMC medical ethics · 2016
   Article
5. Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know--that is not the question.BMC medical ethics · 2016
   Article
6. Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015
   Article
7. The fiduciary relationship model for managing clinical genomic "incidental" findings.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2014
   Article
8. Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes.American journal of human genetics · 2013
   Article
9. Response to open peer commentaries on "do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?".The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?2013

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as