Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2013
Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 637 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interventional Management of Stroke Trial (IMS III): A Phase III Clinical Trial Examining Whether a Combined Intravenous (IV) and Intra-Arterial (IA) Approach to Recanalization is Superior to Standard IV Rt-PA (Activase®) Alone
Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: Endovascular Interventions vs Standard Medical Treatment
Impact of Apixaban on Clinical Outcome of the Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion or Stenosis Trial
A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Aureva Transcranial Ultrasound Device With Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRUST)
Who cites it
637 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stereotactic Drainage Treatment is Associated with Improved Long-Term Neurological Recovery in Small-to-Moderate Volume Basal Ganglia Hemorrhages: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Pooled it
- Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of intravenous mesenchymal stem cells for ischemic stroke patients, a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in stroke · 2023Pooled it
- Mechanical thrombectomy with retrievable stents and aspiration catheters for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Adjunctive cytoprotective therapies in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2021Pooled it
- Endovascular thrombectomy and intra-arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Guidelines for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Japan, the Fourth Edition, March 2020: A Guideline from the Japan Stroke Society, the Japan Neurosurgical Society, and the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2021Guideline
- Comparison of Risk Factors, Safety, and Efficacy Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Posterior vs. Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Autologous bone-marrow mononuclear stem cell therapy in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Health Utility Weighting of the Modified Rankin Scale: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2020Pooled it
- Neuroimaging in Randomized, Multi-Center Clinical Trials of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Pooled it
- A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of emergency endovascular therapy using mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke: implications for service delivery.Irish journal of medical science · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Long-Term Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2019Pooled it
- Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Octogenarians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Pooled it
- Percutaneous vascular interventions versus intravenous thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of economic evaluations on stent-retriever thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.Journal of neurology · 2018Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide at Year 1 in Participants Enrolled in ESCAPE-NEXT: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Blinding of outcome assessors and its association with outcome in a randomized open-label stroke trial.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2023Trial
577 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndovascular therapy is increasingly used after the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) for patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, but whether a combined approach is more effective than intravenous t-PA alone is uncertain.
methodsWe randomly assigned eligible patients who had received intravenous t-PA within 3 hours after symptom onset to receive additional endovascular therapy or intravenous t-PA alone, in a 2:1 ratio. The primary outcome measure was a modified Rankin scale score of 2 or less (indicating functional independence) at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability).
resultsThe study was stopped early because of futility after 656 participants had undergone randomization (434 patients to endovascular therapy and 222 to intravenous t-PA alone). The proportion of participants with a modified Rankin score of 2 or less at 90 days did not differ significantly according to treatment (40.8% with endovascular therapy and 38.7% with intravenous t-PA; absolute adjusted difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to 9.1, with adjustment for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score [8-19, indicating moderately severe stroke, or ≥20, indicating severe stroke]), nor were there significant differences for the predefined subgroups of patients with an NIHSS score of 20 or higher (6.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.4 to 18.1) and those with a score of 19 or lower (-1.0 percentage point; 95% CI, -10.8 to 8.8). Findings in the endovascular-therapy and intravenous t-PA groups were similar for mortality at 90 days (19.1% and 21.6%, respectively; P=0.52) and the proportion of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 30 hours after initiation of t-PA (6.2% and 5.9%, respectively; P=0.83).
conclusionsThe trial showed similar safety outcomes and no significant difference in functional independence with endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA, as compared with intravenous t-PA alone. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00359424.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.