ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2013
Saccharomyces cerevisiae genetics predicts candidate therapeutic genetic interactions at the mammalian replication fork.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- WD Repeat and HMG Box DNA Binding Protein 1: An Oncoprotein at the Hub of Tumorigenesis and a Novel Therapeutic Target.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- And-1 Coordinates with the FANCM Complex to Regulate Fanconi Anemia Signaling and Cisplatin Resistance.Cancer research · 2022Article
- Synthetic refactor of essential genes decodes functionally constrained sequences in yeast genome.iScience · 2022Article
- Parental histone deposition on the replicated strands promotes error-free DNA damage tolerance and regulates drug resistance.Genes & development · 2022Article
- Discovery and characterization of potent And-1 inhibitors for cancer treatment.Clinical and translational medicine · 2021Article
- A spontaneous mutation in DNA polymerase POL3 during in vitro passaging causes a hypermutator phenotype in Cryptococcus species.DNA repair · 2020Article
- Defects in the GINS complex increase the instability of repetitive sequences via a recombination-dependent mechanism.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Article
- Targeting epigenetics using synthetic lethality in precision medicine.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018Review
- Article
- CRISPR Approaches to Small Molecule Target Identification.ACS chemical biology · 2018Review
- The Nature of Actin-Family Proteins in Chromatin-Modifying Complexes.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
- Selective aggregation of the splicing factor Hsh155 suppresses splicing upon genotoxic stress.The Journal of cell biology · 2017Article
- Role of PCNA and RFC in promoting Mus81-complex activity.BMC biology · 2017Article
- Mutational analysis of fructose-1,6-bis-phosphatase FBP1 indicates partially independent functions in gluconeogenesis and sensitivity to genotoxic stress.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2017Article
- Predicting chemotherapeutic drug combinations through gene network profiling.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Inferring synthetic lethal interactions from mutual exclusivity of genetic events in cancer.Biology direct · 2015Article
- Using Gene Essentiality and Synthetic Lethality Information to Correct Yeast and CHO Cell Genome-Scale Models.Metabolites · 2015Article
- An Updated Collection of Sequence Barcoded Temperature-Sensitive Alleles of Yeast Essential Genes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Therapeutic opportunities within the DNA damage response.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The concept of synthetic lethality has gained popularity as a rational guide for predicting chemotherapeutic targets based on negative genetic interactions between tumor-specific somatic mutations and a second-site target gene. One hallmark of most cancers that can be exploited by chemotherapies is chromosome instability (CIN). Because chromosome replication, maintenance, and segregation represent conserved and cell-essential processes, they can be modeled effectively in simpler eukaryotes such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we analyze and extend genetic networks of CIN cancer gene orthologs in yeast, focusing on essential genes. This identifies hub genes and processes that are candidate targets for synthetic lethal killing of cancer cells with defined somatic mutations. One hub process in these networks is DNA replication. A nonessential, fork-associated scaffold, CTF4, is among the most highly connected genes. As Ctf4 lacks enzymatic activity, potentially limiting its development as a therapeutic target, we exploited its function as a physical interaction hub to rationally predict synthetic lethal interactions between essential Ctf4-binding proteins and CIN cancer gene orthologs. We then validated a subset of predicted genetic interactions in a human colorectal cancer cell line, showing that siRNA-mediated knockdown of MRE11A sensitizes cells to depletion of various replication fork-associated proteins. Overall, this work describes methods to identify, predict, and validate in cancer cells candidate therapeutic targets for tumors with known somatic mutations in CIN genes using data from yeast. We affirm not only replication stress but also the targeting of DNA replication fork proteins themselves as potential targets for anticancer therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.