ArticleKorean journal of pediatrics2013
Immune reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children: a single institution study of 59 patients.
Article in Korean journal of pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- γδ T cell characterisation in the long term after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and its impact on CMV control and cGVHD severity.Clinical & translational immunology · 2025Article
- Immune reconstitution in patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia after haploidentical stem cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2017Article
- Predicting CD4 T-Cell Reconstitution Following Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2017Article
- Article
- Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling approaches in paediatric infectious diseases and immunology.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2014Review
- Immune reconstitution after allogenic stem cell transplantation: An observational study in pediatric patients.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLymphocyte subset recovery is an important factor that determines the success of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Temporal differences in the recovery of lymphocyte subsets and the factors influencing this recovery are important variables that affect a patient's post-transplant immune reconstitution, and therefore require investigation.
methodsThe time taken to achieve lymphocyte subset recovery and the factors influencing this recovery were investigated in 59 children who had undergone HSCT at the Department of Pediatrics, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, and who had an uneventful follow-up period of at least 1 year. Analyses were carried out at 3 and 12 months post-transplant. An additional study was performed 1 month post-transplant to evaluate natural killer (NK) cell recovery. The impact of pre- and post-transplant variables, including diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia posttransplant, on lymphocyte recovery was evaluated.
resultsTHE LYMPHOCYTE SUBSETS RECOVERED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: NK cells, cytotoxic T cells, B cells, and helper T cells. At 1 month post-transplant, acute graft-versus-host disease was found to contribute significantly to the delay of CD16(+)/56(+) cell recovery. Younger patients showed delayed recovery of both CD3(+)/CD8(+) and CD19(+) cells. EBV DNAemia had a deleterious impact on the recovery of both CD3(+) and CD3(+)/CD4(+) lymphocytes at 1 year post-transplant.
conclusionIn our pediatric allogeneic HSCT cohort, helper T cells were the last subset to recover. Younger age and EBV DNAemia had a negative impact on the post-transplant recovery of T cells and B cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.