Social neuroscience: the second phase.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Specialty Grand Challenge Article- Social Neuroergonomics.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2021
   Article
2. Systematic analysis of video data from different human-robot interaction studies: a categorization of social signals during error situations.Frontiers in psychology · 2015
   Article
3. Addiction science: Uncovering neurobiological complexity.Neuropharmacology · 2014
   Review
4. Implicit and explicit social mentalizing: dual processes driven by a shared neural network.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013
   Review
5. Toward understanding social cues and signals in human-robot interaction: effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.