Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23390369›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology : advances and applications2013

A Phase 1, randomized, open-label crossover study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of 400 mg albaconazole administered to healthy participants as a tablet formulation versus a capsule formulation.

Koen van Rossem, Jenny A Lowe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01039883 (A Phase 1, Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of 400 mg Albaconazole as a Tablet Formulation Versus a Capsule Formulation in Healthy Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01039883 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of 400 mg Albaconazole as a Tablet Formulation Versus a Capsule Formulation in Healthy Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorStiefel, a GSK CompanyRan2009 to 2010Enrolled40ConditionsOnychomycosisArmsAlbaconazole tablet 400mg, Albaconazole 100mg capsules, then albaconazole 400mg tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Albaconazole Polymeric Nanocapsules for TreatingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Koen van RossemStiefel, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Jenny A Lowe
Research Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlbaconazole is a novel triazole being developed for the oral treatment of fungal diseases. Once-weekly oral dosing with 400 mg albaconazole for 24 or 36 weeks resulted in high rates of clinical and mycological resolution for distal subungual onychomycosis, as well as a favorable safety and tolerability profile. PURPOSE: To compare four 100-mg albaconazole capsules to one 400-mg albaconazole tablet for bioavailability, bioequivalence, tolerability, and safety. PATIENTS AND

methodsForty participants were enrolled in this Phase I, open-label, two-sequence crossover study. Twenty participants were exposed to a single 400-mg tablet dose of albaconazole before being crossed over to a single dose of four 100-mg albaconazole capsules. The second group of 20 participants received the study products in reverse order. Blood samples were taken over 15 days post-dose to assess the plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of albaconazole and its primary metabolite, 6-hydroxyalbaconazole. Safety was assessed throughout the study.

resultsThe area under the curve (AUC) and maximum measured plasma concentration (C(max)) of the albaconazole tablet were approximately 10% and 22% lower, respectively, than for the albaconazole capsules. Statistical significance was reached for the C(max) but not for the AUC measurements (AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf)). Because the 90% confidence intervals based on the differences between the tablet and capsule were outside the 80%-125% range for both the C(max) and AUC, we concluded that the formulations were not bioequivalent with respect to the rate or extent of absorption. Both formulations were safe and well-tolerated in this study. All adverse events (AEs) were generally mild and were mainly gastrointestinal- or nervous system-related (eg, dizziness, headache). No electrocardiogram findings were reported as an AE, and no serious AEs or deaths were reported.

conclusionThe AUC and C(max) of albaconazole after a single 400-mg oral dose administered as a tablet formulation were lower than those of a capsule formulation. Albaconazole tablets and capsules cannot, therefore, be considered bioequivalent.

Indexed as

albaconazoleonychomycosispharmacokineticstriazole

Identifiers

PMID23390369
PMCPMC3564460
OpenAlexW2009507417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.