Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23389661›Full record

ReviewNeurochemical research2013

NMDA receptor activation: two targets for two co-agonists.

Christian Henneberger, Lucie Bard, Claire King, Alistair Jennings, Dmitri A Rusakov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurochemical research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. L-serine synthesis via the phosphorylated pathway in humans.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. D-Amino Acid Oxidase-pLG72 Interaction and D-Serine Modulation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spatial organization of astrocytes in ferret visual cortex.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian HennebergerInstitute of Cellular Neuroscience, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. christian.henneberger@ukb.uni-bonn.de
Lucie Bard
Claire King
Alistair Jennings
Dmitri A Rusakov
University College London · GBUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802216Medical Research Council G0900613Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) play a critical role in synaptic plasticity. Their activation requires not only binding of their ligand glutamate and membrane depolarization but also the presence of a co-agonist, glycine or D-serine. An increasing body of experimental evidence suggests that different populations of NMDARs could be gated by different co-agonists. Here we discuss how the spatial distribution of co-agonist sources and uptake mechanisms, together with diffusional properties of the synaptic environment, could shape NMDAR co-agonist supply and therefore NMDAR-dependent plasticity.

Indexed as

Amino Acid Transport System ASCAnimalsGlycineHumansNeuronal PlasticityReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSerineSynapsesAmino Acid Transport System ASCGlycineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSerine

Identifiers

PMID23389661
OpenAlexW2060930176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.