Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23388617›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2013

Drosophila melanogaster: a model and a tool to investigate malignancy and identify new therapeutics.

Cayetano Gonzalez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Drosophila Study Model for EWS::FLI1-Induced Molecular Pathways.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. A Landscape ofBiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Modelling Cancer in Drosophila: Exploration to Personalised Medicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Drosophila as a Model for Metastasis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  18. Notch Signaling in Drosophila Tumor Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Cayetano GonzalezIRB-Barcelona, c/Baldiri Reixac 10-12, Barcelona, Spain. gonzalez@ irbbarcelona.org

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, lower-model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster have often provided the first glimpse into the mechanism of action of human cancer-related proteins, thus making a substantial contribution to elucidating the molecular basis of the disease. More recently, D. melanogaster strains that are engineered to recapitulate key aspects of specific types of human cancer have been paving the way for the future role of this 'workhorse' of biomedical research, helping to further investigate the process of malignancy, and serving as platforms for therapeutic drug discovery.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterNeoplasmsAnimalsDrug DiscoveryHumans

Identifiers

PMID23388617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.