Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2013
Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 400 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Synthesis Expansion: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Intra-Arterial Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: Endovascular Interventions vs Standard Medical Treatment
A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Aureva Transcranial Ultrasound Device With Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRUST)
Dual Energy CT for Confirming Hemorrhagic Transformation After Thrombectomy for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Who cites it
400 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,276 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing Early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Versus 90-Day Modified Rankin Scale Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Mechanical thrombectomy with retrievable stents and aspiration catheters for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Endovascular thrombectomy and intra-arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Guidelines for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Japan, the Fourth Edition, March 2020: A Guideline from the Japan Stroke Society, the Japan Neurosurgical Society, and the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2021Guideline
- Efficacy of adipose derived stem cells on functional and neurological improvement following ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Neuroimaging in Randomized, Multi-Center Clinical Trials of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Octogenarians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Pooled it
- Percutaneous vascular interventions versus intravenous thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of economic evaluations on stent-retriever thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.Journal of neurology · 2018Pooled it
- Endovascular Treatment Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Quantitative Review and Meta-Analysis of 21 Randomized Trials.Molecular neurobiology · 2017Pooled it
- Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy for Acute Anterior Ischemic Stroke with Tandem Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European radiology · 2017Pooled it
- Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques · 2016Pooled it
- Improved clinical outcome 3 months after endovascular treatment, including thrombectomy, in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2016Pooled it
- Endovascular Treatment versus Best Medical Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2016Pooled it
- Effect of waivers of consent on recruitment in acute stroke trials: A systematic review.Neurology · 2016Pooled it
- Endovascular treatment versus medical care alone for ischaemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- Endovascular Treatment with Stent-Retriever Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
340 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn patients with ischemic stroke, endovascular treatment results in a higher rate of recanalization of the affected cerebral artery than systemic intravenous thrombolytic therapy. However, comparison of the clinical efficacy of the two approaches is needed.
methodsWe randomly assigned 362 patients with acute ischemic stroke, within 4.5 hours after onset, to endovascular therapy (intraarterial thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator [t-PA], mechanical clot disruption or retrieval, or a combination of these approaches) or intravenous t-PA. Treatments were to be given as soon as possible after randomization. The primary outcome was survival free of disability (defined as a modified Rankin score of 0 or 1 on a scale of 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no symptoms, 1 no clinically significant disability despite symptoms, and 6 death) at 3 months.
resultsA total of 181 patients were assigned to receive endovascular therapy, and 181 intravenous t-PA. The median time from stroke onset to the start of treatment was 3.75 hours for endovascular therapy and 2.75 hours for intravenous t-PA (P<0.001). At 3 months, 55 patients in the endovascular-therapy group (30.4%) and 63 in the intravenous t-PA group (34.8%) were alive without disability (odds ratio adjusted for age, sex, stroke severity, and atrial fibrillation status at baseline, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 1.14; P=0.16). Fatal or nonfatal symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 7 days occurred in 6% of the patients in each group, and there were no significant differences between groups in the rates of other serious adverse events or the case fatality rate.
conclusionsThe results of this trial in patients with acute ischemic stroke indicate that endovascular therapy is not superior to standard treatment with intravenous t-PA. (Funded by the Italian Medicines Agency, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00640367.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.